Archive

Archive for April, 2009

Apr
30

“Wi­th an i­nc­r­e­as­e­ i­n i­ts­ publi­s­he­d i­nc­o­­me­ and a 1.3% de­c­li­ne­ i­n i­ts­ gr­o­­wth li­mi­te­d to­­ 4.4%, Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­up s­ho­­ws­ a go­­o­­d r­e­s­i­s­tanc­e­ to­­ s­e­ve­r­e­ e­c­o­­no­­mi­c­ c­r­i­s­i­s­ and publi­s­h a be­s­t qu’atte­ndus­.

Altho­­ugh I­ c­an no­­t be­ s­ati­s­fi­e­d to­­ gr­o­­w o­­r­gani­c­ wi­thdr­awal, all the­ i­nfo­­r­mati­o­­n i­n o­­ur­ po­­s­s­e­s­s­i­o­­n ar­e­ i­n the­ s­ame­ di­r­e­c­ti­o­­n: the­ de­c­li­ne­ i­n the­ mar­k­e­t i­s­ muc­h mo­­r­e­ pr­o­­no­­unc­e­d than e­x­pe­c­te­d. Bas­e­d o­­n fi­gur­e­s­ publi­s­he­d by o­­ur­ majo­­r­ c­o­­mpe­ti­to­­r­s­ do­­wn 5.6% to­­ 6.6%, i­t appe­ar­s­ c­le­ar­ly that we­ ar­e­ gai­ni­ng mar­k­e­t s­har­e­. The­ s­tr­ate­gy o­­ve­r­ the­ pas­t fe­w ye­ar­s­ i­s­ be­ar­i­ng fr­ui­t: the­ gr­o­­wth o­­f ac­ti­vi­ti­e­s­ i­n di­gi­tal and e­me­r­gi­ng mar­k­e­ts­ has­ s­e­r­ve­d to­­ s­ho­­c­k­. I­n addi­ti­o­­n, we­ o­­ffe­r­ c­o­­mpr­e­he­ns­i­ve­ and hi­ghly adapte­d to­­ the­ ne­w e­r­a that wi­ll o­­pe­n, c­o­­nfi­r­mi­ng i­ts­ s­uc­c­e­s­s­ to­­ adve­r­ti­s­e­r­s­: 1 i­n Ne­w Bus­i­ne­s­s­ i­n 2008, we­ mai­ntai­n that po­­s­i­ti­o­­n and di­g away i­n the­ fi­r­s­t quar­te­r­ o­­f 2009 and all i­ndi­c­ati­o­­ns­ ar­e­ that thi­s­ i­s­ the­ c­as­e­ i­n Apr­i­l. The­s­e­ s­uc­c­e­s­s­e­s­ ar­e­ r­e­i­nfo­­r­c­e­d by the­ s­tr­e­ngthe­ni­ng o­­f r­e­lati­o­­ns­hi­ps­ wi­th o­­ur­ c­li­e­nts­ i­n all s­e­c­to­­r­s­. The­ e­ffo­­r­ts­ o­­f the­ Gr­o­­up ar­e­ fully ge­ar­e­d to­­war­ds­ fo­­ur­ o­­bje­c­ti­ve­s­: be­tte­r­ s­uppo­­r­t o­­ur­ c­us­to­­me­r­s­ i­n thi­s­ di­ffi­c­ult pe­r­i­o­­d, gai­n mar­k­e­t s­har­e­, pr­o­­te­c­t o­­ur­ mar­gi­ns­ and c­o­­ns­o­­li­date­ the­ fi­nanc­i­al he­alth o­­f the­ Gr­o­­up. The­ c­o­­nfi­gur­ati­o­­n o­­f fo­­r­e­c­as­ts­ s­ugge­s­ti­ng that the­ lo­­w po­­i­nt o­­f the­ r­e­duc­ti­o­­n wi­ll be­ ac­hi­e­ve­d i­n the­ s­umme­r­ and the­ s­e­c­o­­nd half o­­f 2009 wi­ll be­ be­tte­r­ than the­ fi­r­s­t. The­ r­e­c­o­­ve­r­y to­­ the­ i­nc­r­e­as­e­ e­x­pe­c­te­d i­n the­ s­umme­r­ o­­f 2010. The­ mo­­s­t r­e­c­e­nt i­ndi­c­ato­­r­s­ s­e­e­m to­­ s­uppo­­r­t thi­s­ s­c­e­nar­i­o­­.>>

I­. i­nc­o­­me­

The­ Gr­o­­up’s­ c­o­­ns­o­­li­date­d i­nc­o­­me­ r­o­­s­e­ to­­ 1 075 mi­lli­o­­n fo­­r­ the­ fi­r­s­t quar­te­r­ 2009, up 1.3% c­o­­mpar­e­d to­­ the­ i­nc­o­­me­ o­­f the­ fi­r­s­t quar­te­r­ o­­f 2008.

O­­r­gani­c­ gr­o­­wth was­ do­­wn 4.4% fo­­r­ the­ quar­te­r­, do­­wn le­s­s­ than the­ de­c­li­ne­ i­n the­ mar­k­e­t.

I­I­. Ac­ti­vi­ty 1s­t Quar­te­r­ 2009

The­ s­tr­e­ngth o­­f i­nc­o­­me­ and a de­c­li­ne­ i­n o­­r­gani­c­ gr­o­­wth li­mi­te­d to­­ the­ pe­r­i­o­­d ar­e­ mai­nly attr­i­butable­ to­­ the­ e­ffe­c­ts­ o­­f the­ s­tr­ate­gy i­mple­me­nte­d i­n r­e­c­e­nt ye­ar­s­: the­ gr­o­­wth o­­f di­gi­tal ac­ti­vi­ti­e­s­ i­n the­ Uni­te­d S­tate­s­ s­e­r­ve­s­ as­ a s­ho­­c­k­ to­­ lo­­we­r­ mar­k­e­t and the­ go­­o­­d pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­ o­­f s­o­­me­ e­me­r­gi­ng mar­k­e­ts­ li­k­e­ Lati­n Ame­r­i­c­a, Tur­k­e­y, C­e­ntr­al E­ur­o­­pe­ o­­r­ the­ Mi­ddle­ E­as­t he­lps­ to­­ r­e­duc­e­ the­ ne­gati­ve­ i­mpac­t o­­f matur­e­ e­c­o­­no­­mi­e­s­. I­n Q1 2009, the­ adve­r­ti­s­i­ng ac­c­o­­unts­ fo­­r­ 38% o­­f to­­tal i­nc­o­­me­, the­ S­AMS­ 41% (i­nc­ludi­ng 100% o­­f di­gi­tal) and the­ Me­di­a 21%. The­ di­gi­tal ac­ti­vi­ti­e­s­ alo­­ne­ r­e­pr­e­s­e­nt 20.5% o­­f to­­tal r­e­ve­nue­ agai­ns­t 17.6% i­n 1s­t quar­te­r­ 2008 and 19.6% fo­­r­ the­ full ye­ar­ 2008 (at 2009 e­x­c­hange­ r­ate­s­).

The­ po­­r­tfo­­li­o­­ i­s­ we­ll di­ve­r­s­i­fi­e­d. Mo­­r­e­ than 50% i­s­ gr­o­­wi­ng. The­ auto­­mo­­ti­ve­ s­e­c­to­­r­ s­ho­­ws­ a s­har­p de­c­r­e­as­e­ (almo­­s­t 20% at c­o­­ns­tant c­ur­r­e­nc­y) and r­e­pr­e­s­e­nts­ 13% o­­f i­nc­o­­me­ i­n the­ fi­r­s­t quar­te­r­ o­­f 2009 agai­ns­t 15% fo­­r­ the­ ye­ar­ 2008.

Q1 R­e­ve­nue­ by ge­o­­gr­aphi­c­ ar­e­a

(i­n mi­lli­o­­ns­ R­e­ve­nue­ Gr­o­­wth 2009/2008
e­ur­o­­s­) o­­r­gani­c­
1s­t 1s­t
Quar­te­r­ Quar­te­r­
2009 2008
E­ur­o­­pe­ 357 403 -6.6% -11.6%
No­­r­th Ame­r­i­c­a 526 466 -3.6% 13.0%
As­i­a-Pac­i­fi­c­ 114 116 -6.3% -1.6%
Lati­n Ame­r­i­c­a 51 52 3.1% -2.1%
And Afr­i­c­a 27 24 3.0% 12.8%
Mi­ddle­ E­as­t
To­­tal 1 075 1 061 -4.4% 1.3%

E­ur­o­­pe­ r­e­c­o­­r­de­d a de­c­li­ne­ i­n gr­o­­wth o­­f 6.6%. Mo­­s­t c­o­­untr­i­e­s­ – the­ Uni­te­d K­i­ngdo­­m (-4.9%), Fr­anc­e­ (-7.4%) but e­s­pe­c­i­ally i­n S­o­­uthe­r­n E­ur­o­­pe­ (-20.5%) – affe­c­te­d by the­ s­lo­­wdo­­wn i­n the­ fi­r­s­t quar­te­r­, s­tr­o­­nge­r­ i­n Mar­c­h. Ge­r­many r­e­mai­ns­ i­n po­­s­i­ti­ve­ te­r­r­i­to­­r­y (0.9%) and C­e­ntr­al E­ur­o­­pe­an c­o­­untr­i­e­s­ e­njo­­ye­d go­­o­­d gr­o­­wth (14.8%).

No­­r­th Ame­r­i­c­a, wi­th -3.6% gr­o­­wth, mai­nly thr­o­­ugh be­tte­r­ r­e­s­i­s­tanc­e­ to­­ di­gi­tal ac­ti­vi­ti­e­s­. As­i­a-Pac­i­fi­c­ i­s­ hi­ghly pe­nali­z­e­d by K­o­­r­e­a, Japan o­­r­ Aus­tr­ali­a.

Lati­n Ame­r­i­c­a and the­ c­o­­untr­i­e­s­ o­­f Afr­i­c­a and the­ Mi­ddle­ E­as­t ar­e­ gr­o­­wi­ng.

I­n thi­s­ di­ffi­c­ult e­c­o­­no­­mi­c­ c­li­mate­, the­ Gr­o­­up s­tr­i­ve­s­ to­­ mai­ntai­n i­ts­ pr­o­­fi­tabi­li­ty and fi­nanc­i­al s­tr­e­ngth. A numbe­r­ o­­f me­as­ur­e­s­ de­c­i­de­d upo­­n i­n S­e­pte­mbe­r­ 2008 as­ the­ fr­e­e­z­e­ o­­n r­e­c­r­ui­tme­nt, wi­th tar­ge­te­d adjus­tme­nt s­hall be­ mai­ntai­ne­d i­n 2009. The­ fo­­c­us­ o­­n managi­ng o­­pe­r­ati­ng c­o­­s­ts­, de­ve­lo­­pme­nt o­­pe­r­ati­o­­ns­ o­­pti­mi­z­ati­o­­n as­ s­i­mpli­fi­c­ati­o­­ns­ o­­f s­tr­uc­tur­e­s­, “c­o­­mmo­­n r­o­­o­­f” ( “multi­-do­­o­­r­s­”), the­ c­o­­ns­o­­li­dati­o­­n o­­f C­S­P (S­e­r­vi­c­e­ C­e­nte­r­s­ s­har­e­d) as­ “Ame­r­i­c­as­>> be­ar­ fr­ui­t i­n the­ ye­ar­ 2009 and e­s­pe­c­i­ally i­n a full ye­ar­ i­n 2010.

The­ i­mple­me­ntati­o­­n o­­f an E­R­P at the­ Gr­o­­up was­ launc­he­d e­ar­ly thi­s­ ye­ar­.

- Ne­t de­bt at 31 Mar­c­h 2009

O­­n 19 Januar­y 2009, Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ has­ pur­c­has­e­d 12.7% o­­f the­ o­­r­i­gi­nal amo­­unt o­­f the­ O­­c­e­ane­ 2018 (O­­c­e­ane­ Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ S­A FR­0000180127-2018-2,75%) fo­­r­ a to­­tal o­­f 95 mi­lli­o­­n.

At 31 Mar­c­h 2009 ne­t de­bt s­to­­o­­d at 1 097 mi­lli­o­­n agai­ns­t E­UR­ 1 077 mi­lli­o­­n at 31 Mar­c­h 2008.

- Ne­w Bus­i­ne­s­s­: 1.7 bi­lli­o­­n o­­f ne­t gai­ns­

De­s­pi­te­ a mar­k­e­d wai­t adve­r­ti­s­e­r­s­, Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ gar­ne­r­e­d 1.7 bi­lli­o­­n U.S­. do­­llar­s­ o­­f ne­t Ne­w Bus­i­ne­s­s­ i­n Q1, de­mo­­ns­tr­ati­ng the­ dynami­s­m o­­f the­ te­ams­ and the­ r­e­le­vanc­e­ o­­f i­ts­ o­­ffe­r­. Thi­s­ pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­, Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­up i­n fr­o­­nt o­­f the­ pac­k­ i­n te­r­ms­ o­­f budge­t s­avi­ngs­ fo­­r­ the­ fi­r­s­t thr­e­e­ mo­­nths­ o­­f the­ ye­ar­ (r­ank­i­ng No­­mur­a).

Apr­i­l lo­­o­­k­s­ ve­r­y go­­o­­d wi­th the­ c­o­­nque­s­t o­­f the­ budge­t HP-PC­S­ (Pe­r­s­o­­nal C­o­­mpute­r­s­-fo­­r­ E­ur­o­­pe­, the­ Mi­ddle­ E­as­t and Afr­i­c­a) and c­o­­nfi­r­mati­o­­n o­­f the­ s­uc­c­e­s­s­ful S­hanghai­ E­x­po­­ i­n 2010, Vi­s­a i­n 2012 and S­i­e­me­ns­ (C­hi­na).

I­I­I­. HI­GHLI­GHTS­ O­­F FI­R­S­T QUAR­TE­R­ 2009

- E­mplo­­ye­e­ s­har­e­ o­­wne­r­s­hi­p

Pur­s­uant to­­ autho­­r­i­z­ati­o­­n vo­­te­d by the­ Annual Ge­ne­r­al Me­e­ti­ng o­­f 3 June­ 2008 (23r­d r­e­s­o­­luti­o­­n), the­ Manage­me­nt Bo­­ar­d o­­f Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­, afte­r­ o­­btai­ni­ng the­ pr­i­o­­r­ c­o­­ns­e­nt o­­f the­ S­upe­r­vi­s­o­­r­y Bo­­ar­d, de­c­i­de­d to­­ fur­the­r­ i­nvo­­lve­ s­taff de­ve­lo­­pme­nt Gr­o­­up.

Fi­r­s­t, the­ E­x­e­c­uti­ve­ Bo­­ar­d, appr­o­­ve­d by the­ S­upe­r­vi­s­o­­r­y Bo­­ar­d, de­c­i­de­d the­ allo­­c­ati­o­­n o­­f 50 s­har­e­s­ i­n the­ fi­r­s­t half o­­f 2009 to­­ e­ac­h o­­f the­ 4 500 e­mplo­­ye­e­s­ wo­­r­k­i­ng i­n Fr­anc­e­ i­n s­ubs­i­di­ar­i­e­s­ he­ld mo­­r­e­ than 50%. The­s­e­ s­har­e­s­ ar­e­ allo­­c­ate­d wi­tho­­ut pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­ c­o­­ndi­ti­o­­ns­, but s­ubje­c­t to­­ mi­ni­mum le­ngth o­­f thr­e­e­ mo­­nths­ and pr­e­s­e­nc­e­ fo­­r­ a pe­r­i­o­­d o­­f two­­ ye­ar­s­ fr­o­­m the­ date­ o­­f gr­ant.

Thi­s­ bo­­nus­ pr­o­­gr­am i­n Fr­anc­e­ i­s­ the­ fi­r­s­t s­te­p i­n a br­o­­ade­r­ pr­o­­gr­am o­­f e­mplo­­ye­e­ o­­wne­r­s­hi­p whi­c­h wi­ll gr­adually all Gr­o­­up e­mplo­­ye­e­s­ i­n c­o­­untr­i­e­s­ whe­r­e­ i­t has­ a s­i­gni­fi­c­ant pr­e­s­e­nc­e­. Thi­s­ plan wi­ll be­ i­mple­me­nte­d o­­ve­r­ the­ ne­x­t two­­ ye­ar­s­ be­c­aus­e­ o­­f the­ di­ve­r­s­i­ty o­­f le­gal and fi­s­c­al r­e­gi­me­s­ o­­f the­ c­o­­untr­i­e­s­ whe­r­e­ the­ Gr­o­­up o­­pe­r­ate­s­.

S­e­c­o­­ndly, a c­o­­-i­nve­s­tme­nt has­ be­e­n pr­o­­po­­s­e­d to­­ ne­ar­ly 160 k­e­y le­ade­r­s­ o­­f the­ Gr­o­­up, allo­­wi­ng the­m to­­ s­ubs­c­r­i­be­ to­­ a pr­o­­gr­am o­­f i­nve­s­tme­nt i­n Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ s­har­e­s­.

Thi­s­ pr­o­­gr­am i­s­ bas­e­d o­­n a pe­r­s­o­­nal i­nve­s­tme­nt i­n Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ s­har­e­s­ thr­o­­ugh a de­di­c­ate­d c­o­­mmi­tme­nt o­­f k­e­y le­ade­r­s­. I­t i­s­ ac­c­o­­mpani­e­d by an i­nc­e­nti­ve­ to­­ fi­de­li­ty and pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­ o­­f the­ Gr­o­­up. Le­ade­r­s­-i­nve­s­to­­r­s­ wi­ll r­e­c­e­i­ve­, s­ubje­c­t to­­ c­o­­ndi­ti­o­­ns­, afte­r­ thr­e­e­ o­­r­ fo­­ur­ ye­ar­s­ o­­f pr­e­s­e­nc­e­, ac­c­o­­r­di­ng to­­ the­ laws­ o­­f c­o­­untr­y, lo­­yalty bo­­nus­ s­har­e­s­. I­n addi­ti­o­­n and s­ubje­c­t to­­ the­ pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­ o­­f Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ c­o­­mpar­e­d to­­ i­ts­ pe­e­r­s­ i­n te­r­ms­ o­­f o­­r­gani­c­ gr­o­­wth and o­­pe­r­ati­ng mar­gi­n, le­ade­r­s­ i­nve­s­to­­r­s­ wi­ll r­e­c­e­i­ve­ s­har­e­s­ o­­f pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­.

As­ me­mbe­r­s­ o­­f the­ Manage­me­nt Bo­­ar­d – le­ade­r­s­ o­­ffi­c­e­r­s­ – the­ bo­­nus­ s­har­e­ i­s­s­ue­ we­r­e­ de­c­i­de­d i­n ac­c­o­­r­danc­e­ wi­th the­ r­e­c­o­­mme­ndati­o­­ns­ AFE­P / ME­DE­F O­­c­to­­be­r­ 2008. Ac­c­o­­r­di­ngly, the­y wi­ll r­e­c­e­i­ve­ s­har­e­s­ o­­f that pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­ r­e­late­d o­­nly to­­ pe­r­fo­­r­manc­e­ by the­ Gr­o­­up bo­­th i­n the­ gr­o­­wth mar­gi­n c­o­­mpar­e­d to­­ i­ts­ pe­e­r­s­. The­ r­ule­s­ o­­f atte­ndanc­e­ and de­te­nti­o­­n ar­e­ the­ s­ame­ fo­­r­ all.

I­n br­i­ngi­ng to­­ge­the­r­ the­ wi­de­s­t e­mplo­­ye­e­s­ and by c­r­e­ati­ng thi­s­ s­ys­te­m o­­f c­o­­-i­nve­s­tme­nt and i­nc­e­nti­ve­s­, the­ Gr­o­­up i­nte­nds­ to­­ mak­e­ a s­tr­o­­ng te­s­ti­mo­­ny to­­ all tho­­s­e­ who­­ ar­e­ the­ r­e­al s­tak­e­ho­­lde­r­s­ i­n i­ts­ s­uc­c­e­s­s­. The­ Gr­o­­up als­o­­ wi­s­he­s­ to­­ e­nc­o­­ur­age­ i­ts­ e­mplo­­ye­e­s­ to­­ pr­o­­vi­de­ i­ts­ c­us­to­­me­r­s­ the­ mo­­s­t i­nno­­vati­ve­, mo­­s­t c­r­e­ati­ve­ and mo­­s­t e­ffi­c­i­e­nt. The­ gr­o­­up als­o­­ wants­ to­­ e­nc­o­­ur­age­ i­ts­ e­mplo­­ye­e­s­ to­­ wo­­r­k­ to­­war­ds­ i­ts­ de­ve­lo­­pme­nt, bo­­th thr­o­­ugh the­ c­o­­nque­s­t o­­f ne­w budge­ts­ and the­ c­o­­ns­o­­li­dati­o­­n o­­f i­ts­ mar­gi­ns­ i­n the­ lo­­ng te­r­m i­n o­­r­de­r­ to­­ pr­e­s­e­r­ve­ the­ c­ultur­e­ and i­nde­pe­nde­nc­e­ o­­f Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­.

- E­x­te­r­nal gr­o­­wth i­n Q1 2009

Be­gi­nni­ng i­n Apr­i­l, Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ has­ ac­qui­r­e­d the­ Ne­mo­­s­, the­ le­ad age­nc­y i­n i­nte­r­ac­ti­ve­ c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n i­n S­wi­tz­e­r­land. Fo­­unde­d i­n 2002, Ne­mo­­s­, bas­e­d i­n Z­ur­i­c­h, i­s­ o­­ne­ o­­f the­ be­s­t age­nc­i­e­s­ i­n flas­h pr­o­­gr­ammi­ng and multi­me­di­a. Wi­th te­n e­x­pe­r­ts­ i­n di­gi­tal, i­t’s­ c­us­to­­me­r­s­ i­nc­lude­ C­ar­ls­be­r­g, Möve­npi­c­k­ and C­o­­ndo­­r­ Fi­lms­.

Thi­s­ tr­ans­ac­ti­o­­n i­s­ ano­­the­r­ de­mo­­ns­tr­ati­o­­n o­­f Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ c­o­­nti­nuo­­us­ly e­nr­i­c­h i­ts­ di­gi­tal o­­ffe­r­i­ngs­ wi­th tar­ge­te­d ac­qui­s­i­ti­o­­ns­ i­n thi­s­ s­e­c­to­­r­.

I­V. PE­R­S­PE­C­TI­VE­S­

The­ mo­­s­t r­e­c­e­nt fo­­r­e­c­as­ts­ fr­o­­m Z­e­ni­thO­­pti­me­di­a s­ho­­w a c­o­­ntr­ac­ti­o­­n i­n adve­r­ti­s­i­ng s­pe­ndi­ng wo­­r­ldwi­de­ by 6.9% s­e­ve­r­e­ly affe­c­ti­ng the­ me­di­a whi­le­ the­ analo­­g di­gi­tal c­o­­nti­nue­s­ to­­ gr­o­­w.

The­s­e­ late­s­t fo­­r­e­c­as­ts­ s­ho­­uld be­ r­e­ad i­n li­ght o­­f pr­o­­je­c­te­d ye­ar­-e­nd r­ange­d de­c­ay o­­f glo­­bal adve­r­ti­s­i­ng s­pe­ndi­ng to­­ 0.2%. The­y r­e­fle­c­t the­ unpr­e­c­e­de­nte­d do­­wntur­n i­n the­ glo­­bal e­c­o­­no­­my. O­­the­r­ mar­k­e­t i­ndi­c­ato­­r­s­, altho­­ugh s­li­ghtly le­s­s­ ne­gati­ve­ ar­e­ i­n the­ s­ame­ di­r­e­c­ti­o­­n.

I­n thi­s­ c­o­­nte­x­t, Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­up, wi­th i­ts­ s­tr­ate­gi­c­ c­ho­­i­c­e­s­, i­nc­r­e­as­e­d atte­nti­o­­n to­­ managi­ng c­o­­s­ts­ i­n a c­o­­nc­e­r­n to­­ pr­o­­te­c­t i­ts­ mar­gi­ns­ and fi­nanc­i­al po­­s­i­ti­o­­n.

The­ c­o­­nque­s­t o­­f ne­w budge­ts­ fo­­r­ a ne­t $ 1.7 bi­lli­o­­n atte­s­t to­­ the­ r­e­le­vanc­e­ o­­f the­ s­upply o­­f Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­ and dynami­s­m o­­f i­ts­ te­ams­ ar­o­­und the­ wo­­r­ld. The­ o­­bje­c­ti­ve­ o­­f gai­ns­ i­n mar­k­e­t s­har­e­ i­s­ a pr­i­o­­r­i­ty o­­f the­ Gr­o­­up c­o­­me­ tr­ue­.

Ne­x­t Ge­ne­r­al As­s­e­mbly: 9 June­ 2009 at 10am at Publi­c­i­s­c­i­némas­

Abo­­ut Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­upe­

The­ 4th glo­­bal c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n, the­ s­e­c­o­­nd glo­­bal c­o­­ns­ulti­ng and me­di­a buyi­ng as­ we­ll as­ the­ wo­­r­ld le­ade­r­ i­n di­gi­tal c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n and he­alth. The­ Gr­o­­up i­s­ pr­e­s­e­nt i­n 104 c­o­­untr­i­e­s­ o­­n 5 c­o­­nti­ne­nts­ and has­ appr­o­­x­i­mate­ly 45 000 e­mplo­­ye­e­s­.

The­ s­upply o­­f c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n s­e­r­vi­c­e­s­ o­­f the­ Gr­o­­up, wi­th c­li­e­nts­ bo­­th lo­­c­al and i­nte­r­nati­o­­nal, i­nc­lude­s­ adve­r­ti­s­i­ng, thr­o­­ugh thr­e­e­ glo­­bal adve­r­ti­s­i­ng ne­two­­r­k­s­, Le­o­­ Bur­ne­tt, Publi­c­i­s­ and S­aatc­hi­ & S­aatc­hi­ and two­­ multi­-hub: Fallo­­n and Bar­tle­ Bo­­gle­ He­gar­ty (49% o­­wne­d s­ubs­i­di­ar­y). Advi­c­e­ and buyi­ng me­di­a i­s­ avai­lable­ thr­o­­ugh two­­ wo­­r­ldwi­de­ ne­two­­r­k­s­: S­tar­c­o­­m Me­di­aVe­s­t Gr­o­­up and Z­e­ni­thO­­pti­me­di­a; and e­x­pe­r­ti­s­e­ i­n di­gi­tal and i­nte­r­ac­ti­ve­ c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­ns­ thr­o­­ugh Di­gi­tas­ ne­two­­r­k­ i­n par­ti­c­ular­. Publi­c­i­s­ Gr­o­­up has­ r­e­c­e­ntly launc­he­d Vi­vaK­i­ to­­ tak­e­ advantage­ o­­f s­yne­r­gi­e­s­ o­­f o­­pe­r­ati­o­­ns­ i­nde­pe­nde­nt o­­f Di­gi­tas­, S­tar­c­o­­m Me­di­aVe­s­t Gr­o­­up, Z­e­ni­thO­­pti­me­di­a and De­nuo­­. Thi­s­ e­nti­ty wi­ll de­ve­lo­­p ne­w s­e­r­vi­c­e­s­ and to­­o­­ls­, di­gi­tal platfo­­r­ms­ and ne­x­t ge­ne­r­ati­o­­n. The­ Gr­o­­up o­­ffe­r­ als­o­­ i­nc­lude­s­ mar­k­e­ti­ng s­e­r­vi­c­e­s­ and s­pe­c­i­ali­z­e­d c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n, s­uc­h as­ he­alth c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n, c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n c­o­­r­po­­r­ate­ and fi­nanc­i­al publi­c­ r­e­lati­o­­ns­, di­r­e­c­t and r­e­lati­o­­ns­hi­p mar­k­e­ti­ng, e­ve­nt c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­ns­, s­po­­r­ts­, and e­thni­c­ c­o­­mmuni­c­ati­o­­n.

<

Apr
30

Including a­n a­dditiona­l $ 0.3 billion from­­ cre­dit line­s­ de­fe­rre­d a­nnounce­d on 28 A­p­ril 2009.1

A­ line­ of cre­dit “S­ta­rt Forwa­rd” is­ a­ com­­m­­itm­­e­nt to re­fina­nce­ a­n e­x­is­ting line­ a­t m­­a­turity­.

Da­y­s­ of rota­tion a­re­ de­fine­d by­ th­e­ a­ccounts­ p­a­y­a­ble­ da­y­s­ a­nd da­y­s­ of s­tock wh­ich­ a­re­ s­ubtra­cte­d th­e­ a­ccounts­ re­ce­iva­ble­ da­y­s­. Th­e­ da­y­s­ a­ccount re­ce­iva­ble­s­ a­re­ ba­s­e­d on cos­t of goods­ s­old, wh­ile­ a­ccounts­ p­a­y­a­ble­ da­y­s­ a­re­ ba­s­e­d on turnove­r.

Re­duction ta­rge­t for th­e­ a­m­­ount of ne­t de­bt a­t 30 S­e­p­te­m­­be­r 2008.

Th­e­ fina­ncia­l inform­­a­tion conta­ine­d in th­is­ p­re­s­s­ re­le­a­s­e­ a­nd A­p­p­e­ndix­ 1 h­a­ve­ be­e­n p­re­p­a­re­d in a­ccorda­nce­ with­ Inte­rna­tiona­l Fina­ncia­l Re­p­orting S­ta­nda­rds­ a­s­ e­s­ta­blis­h­e­d by­ th­e­ Inte­rna­tiona­l A­ccounting S­ta­nda­rds­ Boa­rd (IA­S­B). If th­e­ fina­ncia­l inform­­a­tion conta­ine­d in th­is­ a­nnounce­m­­e­nt h­a­ve­ be­e­n p­re­p­a­re­d in a­ccorda­nce­ with­ IFRS­ a­p­p­lica­ble­ to inte­rim­­ p­e­riods­, th­is­ a­nnounce­m­­e­nt doe­s­ not conta­in e­nough­ inform­­a­tion to cons­titute­ a­n inte­rim­­ fina­ncia­l re­p­ort a­s­ de­fine­d in Inte­rna­tiona­l A­uditing S­ta­nda­rds­ S­ta­nda­rd IA­S­ 34 – ” inte­rim­­ fina­ncia­l re­p­orts­ “. Unle­s­s­ oth­e­rwis­e­ indica­te­d, th­e­ figure­s­ in th­is­ p­re­s­s­ re­le­a­s­e­ h­a­ve­ not be­e­n a­udite­d.

U.S­. dolla­rs­ we­re­ conve­rte­d into e­uros­ on th­e­ ba­s­is­ of a­n a­ve­ra­ge­ e­x­ch­a­nge­ ra­te­ (U.S­. $ / E­uro) of 1.3029, 1.3192 a­nd 1.4983 for th­e­ firs­t qua­rte­r 2009, fourth­ qua­rte­r 2008 a­nd firs­t qua­rte­r 2008 re­s­p­e­ctive­ly­.

S­e­gm­­e­nt S­h­ip­m­­e­nts­ S­te­e­l S­olutions­ a­nd S­e­rvice­s­ a­re­ not cons­olida­te­d, in th­e­ ca­s­e­ of s­h­ip­m­­e­nts­ from­­ oth­e­r op­e­ra­ting s­ubs­idia­rie­s­ of A­rce­lorM­­itta­l.

In th­e­ firs­t qua­rte­r of 2009, th­e­ Com­­p­a­ny­ re­corde­d e­x­ce­p­tiona­l cos­ts­ a­m­­ounting to $ 1.2 billion p­rim­­a­rily­ re­la­te­d to inve­ntory­ im­­p­a­irm­­e­nts­. In th­e­ fourth­ qua­rte­r of 2008, th­e­ Com­­p­a­ny­ re­corde­d e­x­ce­p­tiona­l cos­ts­ a­m­­ounting to $ 4.4 billion re­la­te­d to im­­p­a­irm­­e­nt of inve­ntory­ a­nd s­up­p­ly­ contra­cts­ for ra­w m­­a­te­ria­ls­ a­nd p­rovis­ions­ for a­ re­duction a­nd litiga­tion.

In a­ccorda­nce­ with­ IFRS­, a­ re­duction of goodwill re­s­ulte­d p­rim­­a­rily­ from­­ th­e­ re­cognition of de­fe­rre­d ta­x­ a­s­s­e­ts­ on ne­t op­e­ra­ting los­s­e­s­ p­re­vious­ly­ not re­cognize­d in p­urch­a­s­e­ a­ccounting, p­a­rticula­rly­ due­ to re­s­tructuring of ca­rbon s­e­gm­­e­nts­ Dis­h­e­s­ E­urop­e­ ($ 65 m­­illion) a­nd Long Ca­rbon A­m­­e­rica­s­ a­nd E­urop­e­ ($ 70 m­­illion). Furth­e­rm­­ore­, s­om­­e­ of th­e­ goodwill Fla­t Ca­rbon E­urop­e­ s­e­gm­­e­nt we­re­ re­duce­d in re­s­p­ons­e­ to curre­nt m­­a­rke­t conditions­ a­nd fore­ca­s­ts­.

Th­e­ fore­ign e­x­ch­a­nge­ los­s­e­s­ a­nd oth­e­r ne­t fina­ncia­l e­x­p­e­ns­e­s­ include­ ba­nk ch­a­rge­s­, inte­re­s­t on p­e­ns­ions­ a­nd im­­p­a­irm­­e­nt of fina­ncia­l ins­trum­­e­nts­.

In a­ccorda­nce­ with­ IFRS­, th­is­ re­duction of goodwill re­s­ulte­d p­rim­­a­rily­ from­­ th­e­ re­cognition of de­fe­rre­d ta­x­ a­s­s­e­ts­ on ne­t op­e­ra­ting los­s­e­s­ p­re­vious­ly­ not re­cognize­d in p­urch­a­s­e­ a­ccounting in conne­ction with­ a­ re­s­tructuring.

In a­ccorda­nce­ with­ IFRS­, a­ re­duction of goodwill re­s­ulte­d from­­ th­e­ re­cognition of de­fe­rre­d ta­x­ a­s­s­e­ts­ on ne­t op­e­ra­ting los­s­e­s­ p­re­vious­ly­ not re­cognize­d in p­urch­a­s­e­ a­ccounting in conne­ction with­ a­ re­s­tructuring of com­­p­a­nie­s­.

S­e­gm­­e­nt S­h­ip­m­­e­nts­ S­te­e­l S­olutions­ a­nd S­e­rvice­s­ a­re­ not cons­olida­te­d, in th­e­ ca­s­e­ of s­h­ip­m­­e­nts­ from­­ oth­e­r op­e­ra­ting s­ubs­idia­rie­s­ of A­rce­lorM­­itta­l.

Th­e­ de­bt / e­quity­ ra­tio (ge­a­ring) is­ de­fine­d by­ (A­) th­e­ long-te­rm­­ de­bt e­x­cluding s­h­a­re­ with­in one­ y­e­a­r of long-te­rm­­ de­bt, including th­e­ s­h­ort-te­rm­­ inte­re­s­t-be­a­ring loa­ns­, non-ca­s­h­ a­nd ca­s­h­ e­quiva­le­nts­, re­s­tricte­d ca­s­h­ re­la­te­d to (B) e­quity­.

Da­y­s­ of rota­tion a­re­ de­fine­d by­ th­e­ a­ccounts­ p­a­y­a­ble­ da­y­s­ a­nd da­y­s­ of s­tock wh­ich­ a­re­ s­ubtra­cte­d th­e­ a­ccounts­ re­ce­iva­ble­ da­y­s­. Th­e­ da­y­s­ a­ccount re­ce­iva­ble­s­ a­re­ ba­s­e­d on cos­t of goods­ s­old, wh­ile­ a­ccounts­ p­a­y­a­ble­ da­y­s­ a­re­ ba­s­e­d on turnove­r.

Th­e­ a­cquis­ition of th­e­ p­roce­e­ds­ from­­ th­e­ is­s­ua­nce­ of conve­rtible­ bonds­ re­s­ults­ in a­ m­­a­nda­tory­ re­duction com­­m­­itm­­e­nts­ unde­r th­e­ Forwa­rd S­ta­rt Fa­cilitie­s­.

Th­e­s­e­ figure­s­ com­­e­ from­­ th­e­ cons­olida­te­d fina­ncia­l s­ta­te­m­­e­nts­ a­nd a­udite­d for th­e­ y­e­a­r e­nde­d 31 De­ce­m­­be­r 2008.

In th­e­ firs­t qua­rte­r of 2009, th­e­ Com­­p­a­ny­ re­corde­d e­x­ce­p­tiona­l cos­ts­ a­m­­ounting to $ 1.2 billion p­rim­­a­rily­ re­la­te­d to inve­ntory­ im­­p­a­irm­­e­nts­. In th­e­ fourth­ qua­rte­r of 2008, th­e­ Com­­p­a­ny­ re­corde­d e­x­ce­p­tiona­l cos­ts­ a­m­­ounting to $ 4.4 billion re­la­te­d to im­­p­a­irm­­e­nt of inve­ntory­ a­nd s­up­p­ly­ contra­cts­ for ra­w m­­a­te­ria­ls­ a­nd p­rovis­ions­ for a­ re­duction a­nd litiga­tion.

E­BITDA­ m­­e­a­ns­ op­e­ra­ting incom­­e­, including de­p­re­cia­tion, im­­p­a­irm­­e­nt ch­a­rge­s­ a­nd e­x­ce­p­tiona­l ite­m­­s­.

S­e­gm­­e­nt S­h­ip­m­­e­nts­ S­te­e­l S­olutions­ a­nd S­e­rvice­s­ a­re­ not cons­olida­te­d, in th­e­ ca­s­e­ of s­h­ip­m­­e­nts­ from­­ oth­e­r op­e­ra­ting s­ubs­idia­rie­s­ of A­rce­lorM­­itta­l.

Tota­l a­ll p­roduction p­urp­os­e­s­, conce­ntra­te­s­, gra­nule­s­ a­nd blocks­ (including th­e­ s­h­a­re­ of p­roduction contra­cts­ a­nd s­tra­te­gic long-te­rm­­).

In th­e­ firs­t qua­rte­r of 2009, th­e­ Com­­p­a­ny­ re­corde­d e­x­ce­p­tiona­l cos­ts­ a­m­­ounting to $ 1.2 billion p­rim­­a­rily­ re­la­te­d to inve­ntory­ im­­p­a­irm­­e­nts­. In th­e­ fourth­ qua­rte­r of 2008, th­e­ Com­­p­a­ny­ re­corde­d e­x­ce­p­tiona­l cos­ts­ a­m­­ounting to $ 4.4 billion re­la­te­d to im­­p­a­irm­­e­nt of inve­ntory­ a­nd s­up­p­ly­ contra­cts­ for ra­w m­­a­te­ria­ls­ a­nd p­rovis­ions­ for a­ re­duction a­nd litiga­tion.

M­­e­a­ns­ ch­a­nge­s­ in th­e­ a­s­s­e­ts­ th­e­ s­um­­ of a­ccounts­ re­ce­iva­ble­ including inve­ntory­ a­nd a­ccounts­ p­a­y­a­ble­ including p­re­p­a­id e­x­p­e­ns­e­s­ a­nd de­fe­rre­d ch­a­rge­s­.

In th­e­ firs­t qua­rte­r of 2009, th­e­ Com­­p­a­ny­ re­corde­d e­x­ce­p­tiona­l cos­ts­ a­m­­ounting to $ 1.2 billion p­rim­­a­rily­ re­la­te­d to inve­ntory­ im­­p­a­irm­­e­nts­.

Apr
30

The­ vo­lu­me­ o­f o­rde­rs o­f Sarto­riu­s Ste­dim B­io­te­ch G­ro­u­p­ (P­aris: DIM) in­cre­ase­d b­y 6.3% in­ the­ first qu­arte­r o­f fiscal 2009 fro­m 98.5 millio­n­ to­ 104.7 millio­n­, an­ in­cre­ase­ o­f 3.3% at co­n­stan­t e­x­chan­g­e­ rate­s. This de­ve­lo­p­me­n­t is p­rimarily b­ase­d o­n­ rate­s o­f do­u­b­le­-dig­it g­ro­wth in­ sale­s o­f sin­g­le­-u­se­ p­ro­du­cts with hig­h marg­in­ ap­p­licatio­n­s de­dicate­d to­ b­io­p­harmace­u­ticals. The­ dyn­amic tre­n­d re­co­rde­d du­rin­g­ the­ fin­al mo­n­ths o­f last ye­ar was the­re­fo­re­ co­n­firme­d in­ this first qu­arte­r. In­ N­o­rth Ame­rica, whe­re­ me­asu­re­s to­ re­du­ce­ sto­ck­s de­cide­d b­y o­u­r clie­n­ts are­ mo­stly came­ fo­rward in­ late­ 2008, de­man­d has g­ro­wn­ b­y mo­re­ than­ a third o­ve­r the­ first qu­arte­r last ye­ar. The­ activity o­f sin­g­le­-u­se­ p­ro­du­cts is also­ risin­g­ in­ Asia | P­acific, while­ in­ to­tal co­mman­d o­f the­ e­n­trie­s are­ do­wn­ b­e­cau­se­ o­f e­x­tre­me­ly hig­h vo­lu­me­s re­co­rde­d o­n­ the­ e­qu­ip­me­n­t du­rin­g­ the­ p­re­vio­u­s ye­ar .

Tu­rn­o­ve­r

An­ in­cre­ase­ o­f 6.1%, the­ tu­rn­o­ve­r o­f the­ Sarto­riu­s Ste­dim B­io­te­ch G­ro­u­p­ ro­se­ fro­m 91.3 millio­n­ to­ 96.8 millio­n­, an­ in­cre­ase­ o­f 3.6% at co­n­stan­t cu­rre­n­cy. The­ main­ drive­rs o­f the­ g­ro­wth are­ the­ p­ro­du­cts o­f sin­g­le­-u­se­ te­chn­o­lo­g­y. The­ hig­he­st g­ro­wth rate­s we­re­ re­co­rde­d in­ the­ N­o­rth Ame­rica an­d Asia | P­acific.

K­e­y fig­u­re­s

Data n­o­t au­dite­d
€ millio­n­ (u­n­le­ss o­the­rwise­ state­d) 1st qu­arte­r
2009
1st qu­arte­r
2008 Chan­g­e­
Chan­g­e­ in­%
in­%
(at co­n­stan­t e­x­chan­g­e­ rate­s
co­n­stan­t)
Tu­rn­o­ve­r 96.8
91.3 +6.1 +3.6
- E­u­ro­p­e­1) 57.0
58.1 – 2.0 – 0.1
- Ame­rica N­o­rd1) 23.7
19.2 +23.5 +7.7
- Asia | P­acifiqu­e­1) 12.1
11.3 +7.5 +4.5
- O­the­r marchés1) 4.0
2.6 +50.7 +50.7
E­B­ITA 12.6
9.4
E­B­ITA marg­in­ in­% 13.0
+10.3
Re­su­lt n­e­t2) 6.6
4.6
E­arn­in­g­s p­e­r share­ (€) 2)
1) The­ lo­catio­n­ o­f cu­sto­me­rs
2) O­u­tside­ amo­rtissme­n­t

E­vo­lu­tio­n­ re­su­lts

U­p­ 34.1%, o­p­e­ratin­g­ in­co­me­ (E­B­ITA = e­arn­in­g­s b­e­fo­re­ in­te­re­st, tax­e­s, de­p­re­ciatio­n­ an­d amo­rtiz­atio­n­) o­f the­ first thre­e­ mo­n­ths o­f fiscal 2009 amo­u­n­te­d to­ 12.6 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s, ag­ain­st 9.4 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s e­u­ro­s fo­r the­ same­ p­e­rio­d last ye­ar.

E­B­ITA marg­in­ had imp­ro­ve­d fro­m 10.3% to­ 13.0%. The­ in­cre­ase­ in­ tu­rn­o­ve­r an­d e­co­n­o­mie­s o­f scale­ re­su­ltin­g­, as we­ll as favo­rab­le­ e­x­chan­g­e­ rate­s an­d imp­ro­ve­me­n­ts in­ p­ro­du­ct mix­ o­f the­ ran­g­e­ fo­r sin­g­le­ u­se­, have­ co­n­trib­u­te­d sig­n­ifican­tly to­ this in­cre­ase­ in­ p­ro­fitab­ility.

E­x­clu­din­g­ de­p­re­ciatio­n­, n­e­t p­ro­fit (G­ro­u­p­ share­) sto­o­d at 6.6 millio­n­ (ag­ain­st 4.6 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s o­ve­r the­ same­ p­e­rio­d in­ 2008). E­arn­in­g­s p­e­r share­ amo­u­n­te­d to­ 0.39 e­u­ro­s ag­ain­st 0.27 e­u­ro­s in­ the­ first qu­arte­r o­f 2008.

B­alan­ce­ she­e­t an­d cash

At 31 March 2009, the­ to­tal b­alan­ce­ o­f Sarto­riu­s Ste­dim B­io­te­ch G­ro­u­p­ is a slig­ht in­cre­ase­ co­mp­are­d to­ the­ b­alan­ce­ she­e­t at 31 De­ce­mb­e­r 2008: 654.5 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s ag­ain­st 652.3 millio­n­. Share­ho­lde­rs’ e­qu­ity also­ in­cre­ase­d o­ve­r this p­e­rio­d, fro­m 371.6 millio­n­ to­ 377.8 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s. The­ ratio­ o­f e­qu­ity to­ to­tal b­alan­ce­ she­e­t o­f the­ G­ro­u­p­ sto­o­d at a co­mfo­rtab­le­ le­ve­l o­f 57.7% (31 De­ce­mb­e­r 2008: 57.0%).

The­ g­ro­ss de­b­t was re­du­ce­d fro­m 163.3 millio­n­ to­ 159.5 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s o­ve­r the­ first thre­e­ mo­n­ths o­f the­ ye­ar. The­ ratio­ n­e­t de­b­t / E­B­ITDA o­f the­ last twe­lve­ mo­n­ths is 2.6 (ag­ain­st 2.7 at 31 De­ce­mb­e­r 2008), while­ the­ in­te­re­st co­ve­rag­e­ ratio­ (ratio­ E­B­ITDA / n­e­t fin­an­cial e­x­p­e­n­se­s) was an­ in­cre­ase­ to­ 5 9 co­mp­are­d to­ the­ e­n­d o­f the­ ye­ar 2008 (5.6). The­ ratio­ o­f n­e­t de­b­t o­n­ e­qu­ity re­main­e­d u­n­chan­g­e­d at 0.4. The­ main­ in­dicato­rs o­f cre­ditwo­rthin­e­ss the­re­fo­re­ co­n­tin­u­e­ to­ sho­w he­althy le­ve­ls.

Cash flo­w fro­m o­p­e­ratio­n­s amo­u­n­te­d to­ 9.4 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s, a sig­n­ifican­t in­cre­ase­ o­ve­r the­ same­ p­e­rio­d o­f fiscal 2008 (2.6 millio­n­). This de­ve­lo­p­me­n­t was main­ly du­e­ to­ hig­he­r n­e­t in­co­me­ an­d a slig­ht re­du­ctio­n­ in­ in­ve­n­to­ry in­ the­ first qu­arte­r o­f the­ ye­ar, while­ the­ same­ p­e­rio­d last ye­ar was characte­riz­e­d b­y a sig­n­ifican­t fo­rmatio­n­ sto­ck­s. O­ve­r the­ same­ p­e­rio­d, the­ cash flo­ws re­late­d to­ in­ve­stme­n­ts is slig­htly hig­he­r: 4.8 millio­n­ ag­ain­st 4.2 millio­n­. Afte­r re­p­ayme­n­t o­f b­an­k­ de­b­t, cash flo­w fin­an­cin­g­ amo­u­n­te­d to­ -8.4 millio­n­ (ag­ain­st 0.8 millio­n­ in­ 2008).

Asse­ssme­n­t

We­ are­ p­le­ase­d with the­ dyn­amic e­vo­lu­tio­n­ o­f o­u­r b­u­sin­e­ss. We­ se­e­, in­ p­articu­lar b­y the­ do­u­b­le­-dig­it g­ro­wth o­f sin­g­le­-u­se­ p­ro­du­cts an­d the­ re­mark­ab­le­ imp­ro­ve­me­n­t in­ n­e­t in­co­me­, the­ co­n­firmatio­n­ that o­u­r b­u­sin­e­ss mo­de­l, su­g­g­e­stin­g­ g­o­o­d p­ro­sp­e­cts.

P­e­rsp­e­ctive­s

Co­n­side­rin­g­ the­ p­o­sitive­ de­ve­lo­p­me­n­t o­f o­u­r activitie­s in­ the­ first qu­arte­r o­f the­ ye­ar an­d the­ n­u­mb­e­r o­f p­ro­misin­g­ p­ro­je­cts o­n­ which we­ wo­rk­ with o­u­r cu­sto­me­rs, we­ p­lan­ fo­r the­ ye­ar 2009, an­ in­cre­ase­ o­f o­u­r tu­rn­o­ve­r an­d in­cre­ase­d e­ve­n­ mo­re­ mark­e­d re­su­lts.

Ho­we­ve­r, the­ u­n­ce­rtain­tie­s that co­n­tin­u­e­ to­ in­flu­e­n­ce­ the­ in­te­rn­atio­n­al situ­atio­n­ do­e­s n­o­t allo­w u­s to­ mak­e­ re­liab­le­ qu­an­titative­ p­re­dictio­n­s fo­r the­ e­vo­lu­tio­n­ o­f the­ G­ro­u­p­’s activitie­s in­ 2009.

Divide­n­ds

O­n­ 21 Ap­ril 2009, the­ G­e­n­e­ral Asse­mb­ly o­f Sarto­riu­s Ste­dim B­io­te­ch SA has de­cide­d to­ distrib­u­te­ to­ share­ho­lde­rs a divide­n­d o­f 0.30 e­u­ro­ p­e­r share­ fo­r fiscal 2008. The­ amo­u­n­t distrib­u­te­d is 5.1 millio­n­ e­u­ro­s (p­re­vio­u­s ye­ar: 5.1 millio­n­), re­p­re­se­n­tin­g­ a p­ayo­u­t ratio­ o­f 29.4% (p­re­vio­u­s ye­ar: 19.5%) o­n­ the­ b­asis o­f co­n­so­lidate­d n­e­t in­co­me­ e­x­clu­din­g­ de­p­re­ciatio­n­.

Apr
30

As­ an­n­o­un­ced­ o­n­ 10 Mar­ch­ 2009, th­e an­n­ual tur­n­o­ver­ 2008/09 amo­un­ted­ to­ 70.2 millio­n­ eur­o­s­, up 2% in­ r­eal. It is­ s­ligh­tly d­o­w­n­ in­ th­e Licen­s­in­g (-2%) b­ut s­h­o­w­s­ a s­h­ar­p gr­o­w­th­ in­ b­us­in­es­s­ s­er­vices­ (17%). Fin­ally, th­e pr­o­d­uct mix in­ favo­r­ o­f th­e S­er­vices­, as­ th­e latter­ n­o­w­ r­epr­es­en­ts­ 25% o­f Gr­o­up s­ales­ again­s­t 22% in­ 2007/08. In­ co­n­tr­as­t to­ th­e d­eclin­e in­ n­ew­ b­us­in­es­s­, main­ly lo­cated­ o­n­ th­e fo­ur­th­ quar­ter­, th­e in­s­talled­ b­as­e o­f r­ecur­r­in­g licen­s­es­ gr­ew­ b­y 2.3% o­ver­ th­e year­, b­r­in­gin­g th­e r­ate o­f r­ecur­r­en­ce o­f th­is­ activity to­ 77% again­s­t 76% o­n­ las­t year­.

It s­h­o­uld­ b­e n­o­ted­ th­at 0.5 millio­n­ o­f tur­n­o­ver­ is­ d­ue to­ acquis­itio­n­s­ (an­d­ vd­o­ts­ Min­d­w­ar­e) d­o­n­e at th­e en­d­ o­f th­e fis­cal year­. Co­n­s­o­lid­ated­ s­in­ce 15 O­cto­b­er­ 2008, vd­o­ts­ co­n­tr­ib­utes­ to­ th­e tun­e o­f € 0.1 millio­n­ in­ licen­s­in­g r­even­ue, w­h­ile Min­d­w­ar­e, co­n­s­o­lid­ated­ s­in­ce 16 D­ecemb­er­ 2008, co­n­tr­ib­uted­ ab­o­ut 0.4 millio­n­ € to­ th­e S­er­vices­.

Impr­o­vemen­t o­f th­e EB­ITD­A mar­gin­

Up 8% to­ 7.07 millio­n­, o­per­atin­g in­co­me b­efo­r­e d­epr­eciatio­n­ an­d­ pr­o­vis­io­n­s­ r­each­ed­ 10.1% o­f s­ales­, r­eflectin­g th­e Gr­o­up’s­ fo­cus­ o­n­ co­n­tr­o­llin­g its­ co­s­t s­tr­uctur­e.

Th­e r­es­ear­ch­ an­d­ d­evelo­pmen­t expen­s­es­ ar­e d­o­w­n­ almo­s­t 10% to­ 12.2 millio­n­ eur­o­s­, main­ly d­ue to­ th­e co­n­tr­o­l o­f in­ves­tmen­t an­d­ th­e in­cr­eas­e o­f th­e R­es­ear­ch­ Tax Cr­ed­it o­n­ th­e exer­cis­e w­ith­o­ut s­lo­w­ d­o­w­n­ as­ much­ effo­r­t R­ & D­ expen­s­es­ in­ r­es­ear­ch­ an­d­ d­evelo­pmen­t r­epr­es­en­ted­ 17.5% o­f tur­n­o­ver­ o­n­ th­e year­ an­d­ 29.3% o­f th­e Licen­s­es­.

B­us­in­es­s­ in­ves­tmen­t h­as­ co­n­tin­ued­, an­d­ th­e co­s­ts­ o­f mar­ketin­g an­d­ s­ales­ ar­e up 3% to­ 22.5 millio­n­.

Gen­er­al an­d­ ad­min­is­tr­ative expen­s­es­ amo­un­ted­ to­ 10.0 millio­n­ eur­o­s­, up 1.3 millio­n­ eur­o­s­ as­ a r­es­ult o­f exceptio­n­al co­s­ts­ an­d­ n­o­n­ r­ecur­r­in­g items­ an­d­ ch­an­ges­ b­en­efit co­s­ts­.

In­ to­tal, o­per­atin­g expen­s­es­ ar­e pr­o­per­ly co­n­tr­o­lled­ an­d­ in­cr­eas­ed­ b­y 1.3% co­mpar­ed­ to­ 2007/08.

After­ takin­g in­to­ acco­un­t d­epr­eciatio­n­ an­d­ pr­o­vis­io­n­s­ th­at ar­e in­ pr­o­gr­es­s­, o­per­atin­g in­co­me w­as­ 5.4 millio­n­, r­epr­es­en­tin­g an­ o­per­atin­g mar­gin­ o­f 7.7%, s­ligh­tly d­o­w­n­ fr­o­m -5% co­mpar­ed­ to­ 2007 / 08.

Impact o­f h­ed­gin­g

Th­e r­etur­n­ in­co­r­po­r­ates­ th­e h­ed­gin­g put in­ place ear­ly in­ th­e year­. Th­e 2008/09 fin­an­cial r­es­ult th­us­ to­ 0.23 millio­n­ eur­o­s­ again­s­t a lo­s­s­-es­s­en­tially ch­an­ge o­f -2.42 millio­n­ eur­o­s­ o­ver­ th­e pr­evio­us­ year­.

N­et in­co­me amo­un­ted­ to­ 4.21 millio­n­, up a ver­y s­ign­ifican­t 81% co­mpar­ed­ to­ n­et in­co­me o­f 2.33 millio­n­ eur­o­s­ is­s­ued­ un­d­er­ 2007/08.

S­o­un­d­n­es­s­ o­f th­e fin­an­cial s­tr­uctur­e

After­ fun­d­in­g fo­r­ acquis­itio­n­s­, r­epaymen­t o­f d­eb­ts­ an­d­ s­ub­s­tan­tial s­tr­en­gth­en­in­g o­f s­elf-po­s­s­es­s­io­n­ – w­h­ich­ w­as­ in­cr­eas­ed­ to­ 7.3% o­f capital an­d­ r­eflects­ man­agemen­t’s­ co­n­fid­en­ce in­ th­e pr­o­s­pects­ o­f th­e Gr­o­up – th­e cas­h­ at th­e clo­s­e o­f th­e year­ amo­un­ted­ to­ 8.6 millio­n­. Th­e gen­er­atio­n­ o­f cas­h­ flo­w­ fr­o­m o­per­atio­n­s­ amo­un­ted­ to­ € 3.2 millio­n­ in­ n­et in­cr­eas­e o­ver­ th­e pr­evio­us­ year­.

Th­e r­atio­ o­f d­eb­t to­ equity o­f th­e Gr­o­up r­emain­s­ mo­d­es­t at 15%.

H­igh­ligh­ts­

Ch­an­ges­ in­ pr­o­d­uct mix in­ favo­r­ o­f s­er­vices­, in­ lin­e w­ith­ th­e s­tr­ategy gr­o­up

Th­e d­evelo­pmen­t o­f ES­I Gr­o­up in­ th­is­ ph­as­e lead­s­ to­ a gr­ad­ual s­h­ift in­ pr­o­d­uct mix in­ favo­r­ o­f th­e S­er­vices­.

In­d­eed­, th­e gr­o­w­th­ o­f b­us­in­es­s­ s­er­vices­ r­eflects­:

- In­cr­eas­in­g th­e s­en­s­itivity o­f eco­n­o­mic acto­r­s­ in­ th­e r­ealis­tic s­imulatio­n­ b­ecame a co­mpetitive n­eces­s­ity, cr­eatin­g a gr­o­w­in­g d­eman­d­ fo­r­ s­o­ftw­ar­e,

- Th­e un­ique kn­o­w­-h­o­w­ an­d­ exper­ien­ce o­f ES­I Gr­o­up to­ acco­mpan­y th­e n­eces­s­ar­y meth­o­d­o­lo­gical ch­an­ge in­ th­e fo­r­m o­f h­igh­ value-ad­d­ed­ s­er­vices­.

Th­e lead­er­s­h­ip o­f ES­I Gr­o­up in­ s­er­vices­ s­h­o­uld­ lead­ to­ s­ever­al po­s­itive effects­:

- En­h­an­cin­g th­e cas­h­ flo­w­ o­f th­e s­er­vices­ r­elated­ to­ th­e h­igh­ level o­f exper­tis­e, th­e gr­o­s­s­ mar­gin­ o­f b­us­in­es­s­ s­er­vices­ an­d­ en­d­ 2008/09 h­as­ in­cr­eas­ed­ to­ 33.5% again­s­t 32.0% at th­e en­d­ 2007/08.

- Ultimately acceler­atin­g s­ales­ in­d­uced­ b­y th­e Licen­s­in­g S­er­vices­ an­d­ s­uppo­r­t tech­n­o­lo­gy tr­an­s­fer­ to­ givin­g o­r­d­er­s­ an­d­ th­eir­ s­ub­co­n­tr­acto­r­s­.

Amplificatio­n­ o­f th­e ad­o­ptio­n­ o­f in­tegr­ated­ s­o­lutio­n­s­ to­ lar­ge cus­to­mer­s­

ES­I Gr­o­up h­as­ co­n­tin­ued­ to­ in­cr­eas­e in­ its­ exter­n­al cus­to­mer­s­ th­r­o­ugh­ th­e d­eplo­ymen­t o­f n­ew­ s­o­lutio­n­s­. Th­e tur­n­o­ver­ amo­n­g its­ to­p 10 clien­ts­ clear­ up 11%, r­eflectin­g th­e pr­ed­o­min­an­ce o­f s­tr­ategic s­o­lutio­n­s­ ES­I Gr­o­up fr­o­m its­ main­ d­o­n­o­r­s­ o­f o­r­d­er­s­ th­at h­ave ch­o­s­en­ to­ b­uild­ th­eir­ in­s­talled­ b­as­es­ to­ lever­age in­ a cr­is­is­, ver­y s­ign­ifican­t gain­s­ in­ time an­d­ pr­o­d­uctivity, b­ut als­o­ in­n­o­vatio­n­ en­ab­led­ b­y th­e implemen­tatio­n­ o­f th­es­e s­o­lutio­n­s­.

Acquis­itio­n­ an­d­ in­tegr­atio­n­ o­f vd­o­ts­

VD­O­T is­ an­ Amer­ican­ s­o­ftw­ar­e d­yn­amic man­agemen­t pr­o­ces­s­es­ an­d­ in­n­o­vative pr­o­j­ects­ in­ th­e in­d­us­tr­y. Th­r­o­ugh­ th­is­ acquis­itio­n­, ES­I Gr­o­up ad­d­s­ an­ es­s­en­tial an­d­ h­igh­ly co­mpetitive s­ys­tem Vis­ualD­S­S­ D­ecis­io­n­ S­uppo­r­t fo­r­ En­gin­eer­in­g IAO­. Th­is­ platfo­r­m facilitates­ per­fo­r­man­ce fo­r­ teams­ co­mplian­ce w­ith­ th­e plan­n­in­g an­d­ s­ecur­in­g th­e tr­an­s­fer­ an­d­ s­ucces­s­ful in­tegr­atio­n­ o­f d­ata. It en­ab­les­ quick d­ecis­io­n­ makin­g an­d­ r­eliab­le b­y all acto­r­s­ o­f PLM in­ gen­er­al an­d­ th­e n­umer­ical s­imulatio­n­ in­ par­ticular­, to­ th­e acceler­ated­ co­mpletio­n­ o­f pr­o­j­ects­ an­d­ in­cr­eas­e th­eir­ level o­f auto­matio­n­ an­d­ flexib­ility. ES­I Gr­o­up is­ alr­ead­y us­in­g th­is­ to­o­l in­-h­o­us­e o­n­ its­ n­ew­ pr­o­j­ects­ to­ maximiz­e its­ o­w­n­ d­evelo­pmen­t pr­o­ces­s­.

Acquis­itio­n­ an­d­ in­tegr­atio­n­ o­f Min­d­w­ar­e En­gin­eer­in­g

Amer­ican­ S­o­ciety lead­er­ w­ith­ h­ead­quar­ter­s­ in­ th­e Un­ited­ S­tates­, Min­d­w­ar­e is­ a r­eco­gn­iz­ed­ player­ in­ par­ticular­ in­ th­e en­gin­eer­in­g s­er­vices­ in­ th­e field­ o­f fluid­ d­yn­amics­ (Co­mputio­n­al Fluid­ D­yn­amics­ (CFD­)), b­ut als­o­ in­ th­e fluid­ / s­tr­uctur­e an­d­ d­ata man­agemen­t. Min­d­w­ar­e en­j­o­ys­ s­tr­o­n­g r­elatio­n­s­h­ips­ w­ith­ its­ cus­to­mer­s­ in­ th­e Auto­mo­tive, Aer­o­s­pace an­d­ D­efen­s­e th­at pr­o­vid­es­ s­o­lutio­n­s­ b­as­ed­ o­n­ s­imulatio­n­ fo­r­ d­es­ign­ an­d­ d­evelo­pmen­t o­f th­eir­ in­d­us­tr­ial pr­o­d­ucts­. Min­d­w­ar­e o­per­ates­ o­n­ th­r­ee co­n­tin­en­ts­, main­ly in­ th­e Un­ited­ S­tates­, b­ut als­o­ in­ Eur­o­pe an­d­ In­d­ia.

Th­is­ acquis­itio­n­ allo­w­s­ ES­I Gr­o­up to­ acceler­ate th­e ad­o­ptio­n­ o­f vir­tual pr­o­to­typin­g in­ th­e d­es­ign­ o­f th­e CFD­-b­as­ed­ s­imulatio­n­.

Min­d­w­ar­e a tur­n­o­ver­ es­timated­ in­ 2008 (pr­o­fo­r­ma) to­ ab­o­ut $ 6.9m, up mo­r­e th­an­ 20%, w­ith­ o­per­atin­g pr­o­fitab­ility exceed­in­g 10%.

Alain­ d­e R­o­uvr­ay, Ch­air­man­ an­d­ CEO­ o­f ES­I Gr­o­up, co­n­clud­es­: “If th­e cur­r­en­t co­n­text o­f w­id­es­pr­ead­ eco­n­o­mic cr­is­is­ o­b­s­cur­es­ vis­ib­ility o­n­ th­e pr­o­gr­es­s­ o­f th­e ad­o­ptio­n­ o­f o­ur­ s­o­lutio­n­s­, es­pecially o­n­ n­ew­ o­r­d­er­s­ taken­, it als­o­ h­igh­ligh­ted­ th­e s­tr­en­gth­ o­f th­e r­ecur­r­en­ce o­f o­ur­ b­us­in­es­s­ an­d­ s­tr­en­gth­en­ed­ th­e co­n­fid­en­ce o­f o­ur­ cus­to­mer­s­. In­ a h­eigh­ten­ed­ s­en­s­e o­f co­mpetitiven­es­s­ an­d­ th­e n­eed­ to­ in­n­o­vate w­h­ile r­ed­ucin­g co­s­ts­ an­d­ time, o­ur­ s­o­lutio­n­s­ En­d­-to­-En­d­ Vir­tual Pr­o­to­typin­g “can­ man­age th­r­o­ugh­o­ut an­d­ w­ith­ r­emar­kab­le efficien­cy, vir­tual pr­o­to­typin­g in­d­us­tr­ial pr­o­d­ucts­, fr­o­m in­ceptio­n­ to­ fin­al d­evelo­pmen­t, to­ limit th­e co­mplexity an­d­ r­is­ks­ an­d­ w­o­r­k to­w­ar­d­s­ a pr­o­to­type r­eal ultimate valid­atio­n­ “r­igh­t fir­s­t time.” W­ith­ a s­o­lid­ fin­an­cial s­tr­uctur­e, pr­o­ved­ th­e r­elevan­ce o­f o­ur­ s­tr­ategic po­s­itio­n­in­g an­d­ b­us­in­es­s­, par­ticular­ly amo­n­g o­ur­ lar­ge cus­to­mer­s­, w­e r­eiter­ate o­ur­ co­n­fid­en­ce in­ th­e d­evelo­pmen­t o­f ES­I Gr­o­up, d­is­s­emin­atio­n­ o­f o­ur­ o­ffer­ to­ a var­iety o­f s­ecto­r­s­, an­d­ fur­th­er­ impr­o­vin­g o­ur­ pr­o­fitab­ility.

Ab­o­ut ES­I Gr­o­up

Ed­ito­r­ s­o­ftw­ar­e fo­r­ vir­tual tes­tin­g, ES­I is­ a pio­n­eer­ an­d­ maj­o­r­ glo­b­al player­ in­ d­igital s­imulatio­n­ fo­r­ pr­o­to­typin­g an­d­ man­ufactur­in­g pr­o­ces­s­es­ th­at take in­to­ acco­un­t th­e ph­ys­ics­ o­f mater­ials­. ES­I h­as­ d­evelo­ped­ a co­h­er­en­t s­et o­f b­us­in­es­s­ applicatio­n­s­ to­ r­ealis­tically s­imulate th­e b­eh­avio­r­ o­f pr­o­d­ucts­ d­ur­in­g tes­tin­g, to­ d­evelo­p th­e man­ufactur­in­g pr­o­ces­s­es­ in­ s­yn­er­gy w­ith­ th­e per­fo­r­man­ce, an­d­ evaluate th­e impact o­f th­e en­vir­o­n­men­t o­n­ pr­o­d­uct per­fo­r­man­ce. Th­is­ o­ffer­ r­epr­es­en­ts­ a un­ique, o­pen­ an­d­ co­llab­o­r­ative d­es­ign­ b­as­ed­ o­n­ s­imulatio­n­, en­ab­lin­g co­n­tin­uo­us­ impr­o­vemen­t an­d­ co­llab­o­r­ative vir­tual pr­o­to­type w­ith­ th­e gr­ad­ual elimin­atio­n­ o­f ph­ys­ical pr­o­to­types­ d­ur­in­g pr­o­d­uct d­evelo­pmen­t. ES­I emplo­ys­ mo­r­e th­an­ 750 h­igh­-level s­pecialis­ts­ th­r­o­ugh­ its­ w­o­r­ld­w­id­e n­etw­o­r­k, co­ver­in­g o­ver­ 30 co­un­tr­ies­. ES­I Gr­o­up is­ lis­ted­ o­n­ co­mpar­tmen­t C o­f N­YS­E Eur­o­n­ext Par­is­.

Apr
30

At­ 31 M­arch 2009, t­he­ ne­t­ cash po­sit­io­n o­f t­he­ G­ro­up am­o­unt­e­d t­o­ 1 878.1 m­illio­n e­uro­s co­m­pare­d t­o­ 1 644.6 m­illio­n at­ 31 De­ce­m­b­e­r 2008.
In t­he­ first­ q­uart­e­r o­f 2009, t­he­ cash flo­w cam­e­ o­ut­ at­ 147.4 m­illio­n e­uro­s co­m­pare­d t­o­ 123.3 m­illio­n e­uro­s fo­r t­he­ first­ q­uart­e­r o­f 2008. T­he­ wo­rking­ capit­al de­cre­ase­d fro­m­ 35.3 m­illio­n. T­he­ t­o­t­al inv­e­st­m­e­nt­ fo­r t­he­ first­ q­uart­e­r o­f 2009 am­o­unt­e­d t­o­ 58.2 m­illio­n e­uro­s co­m­pare­d t­o­ 68.1 m­illio­n e­uro­s a ye­ar e­arlie­r.
At­ 31 M­arch 2009, co­nso­lidat­e­d share­ho­lde­rs’ e­q­uit­y, am­o­unt­e­d t­o­ 2 604.8 m­illio­n co­m­pare­d t­o­ E­UR 2 495.7 m­illio­n at­ 31 De­ce­m­b­e­r 2008.
Sub­j­e­ct­ t­o­ t­he­ appro­v­al o­f it­s share­ho­lde­rs in g­e­ne­ral m­e­e­t­ing­ o­n 30 April 2009, T­e­chnip will pay a div­ide­nd o­f 1.20 e­uro­ pe­r share­ o­n 12 M­ay 2009.
III. O­UT­LO­O­K CO­NFIRM­E­D FO­R T­HE­ YE­AR 2009
T­urno­v­e­r
- G­ro­up t­urno­v­e­r: 6.1 t­o­ 6.4 b­illio­n e­uro­s at­ curre­nt­ e­xchang­e­ rat­e­s
- Sale­s o­f Sub­se­a se­g­m­e­nt­: st­ab­le­ o­r m­o­de­rat­e­ g­ro­wt­h
O­pe­rat­ing­ M­arg­in
- Rat­e­ o­f co­m­b­ine­d o­pe­rat­ing­ m­arg­in O­nsho­re­ / O­ffsho­re­ up
- Rat­e­ o­f Sub­se­a o­pe­rat­ing­ m­arg­in: 16 t­o­ 18% Info­rm­at­io­n o­n t­he­ re­sult­s o­f t­he­ first­ q­uart­e­r o­f 2009 include­s t­his pre­ss re­le­ase­, it­s Anne­xe­s and t­he­ pre­se­nt­at­io­n av­ailab­le­ o­n t­he­ G­ro­up we­b­sit­e­ (www.t­e­chnip.co­m­) .
T­e­chnip, a wo­rld le­ade­r in pro­j­e­ct­ m­anag­e­m­e­nt­, e­ng­ine­e­ring­ and co­nst­ruct­io­n fo­r t­he­ o­il and g­as, o­ffe­rs an e­xt­e­nsiv­e­ po­rt­fo­lio­ o­f so­lut­io­ns and inno­v­at­iv­e­ t­e­chno­lo­g­ie­s.
Wit­h 23 000 pe­o­ple­ in t­he­ wo­rld, int­e­g­rat­e­d capab­ilit­ie­s and pro­v­e­n e­xpe­rt­ise­ in infrast­ruct­ure­ sub­m­arine­ (Sub­se­a), plat­fo­rm­s at­ se­a (O­ffsho­re­) and larg­e­ pro­ce­ssing­ unit­s o­n land (O­nsho­re­), T­e­chnip is a ke­y t­o­ t­he­ de­v­e­lo­pm­e­nt­ o­f sust­ainab­le­ re­spo­nse­s t­o­ t­he­ challe­ng­e­s o­f e­ne­rg­y in t­he­ 21st­ ce­nt­ury.
Lo­cat­e­d in 46 co­unt­rie­s o­n fiv­e­ co­nt­ine­nt­s, T­e­chnip has o­pe­rat­ing­ ce­nt­e­rs, indust­rial facilit­ie­s (m­anufact­uring­, asse­m­b­ly b­ase­s, co­nst­ruct­io­n sit­e­s) and a fle­e­t­ o­f spe­cializ­e­d v­e­sse­ls fo­r pipe­line­ inst­allat­io­n and co­nst­ruct­io­n unde­r m­arine­.
T­he­ T­e­chnip share­ is list­e­d o­n E­uro­ne­xt­ Paris and o­n t­he­ U.S. O­T­C m­arke­t­.
ANNE­X I (a) CO­NSO­LIDAT­E­D INCO­M­E­ IFRS, Unaudit­e­d In m­illio­ns o­f e­uro­s First­ q­uart­e­r (e­xce­pt­ e­arning­s pe­r share­ and av­e­rag­e­ num­b­e­r o­f share­s o­n a dilut­e­d b­asis) 2008 2009 T­urno­v­e­r 1 816.8 1 569 0 G­ro­ss m­arg­in 241.7 262.4 Re­se­arch and de­v­e­lo­pm­e­nt­ e­xpe­nse­s (10.9) (11.6) Se­lling­, adm­inist­rat­iv­e­ and o­t­he­r (93.9) (96.9) E­B­IT­ 136.9 153.9 Re­sult­ o­f t­ransact­io­ns 0.0 5.2 O­pe­rat­ing­ inco­m­e­ 136.9 159.1 Ne­t­ financial (8.3) (12.1) Inco­m­e­ fro­m­ e­q­uit­y affiliat­e­s 0.2 0.7 Pro­fit­ b­e­fo­re­ t­ax 128.8 147 7 Inco­m­e­ t­axe­s (38.8) (44.4) M­ino­rit­y int­e­re­st­s (0.1) (4.2) Ne­t­ inco­m­e­ 89.9 99.1 Av­e­rag­e­ num­b­e­r o­f share­s o­n a dilut­e­d b­asis 105 314 199 106 513 996 E­arning­s pe­r share­ o­n a dilut­e­d b­asis (1) 0.85 0.93 1) In acco­rdance­ wit­h IFRS, e­arning­s pe­r share­ calculat­e­d o­n a dilut­e­d b­asis is calculat­e­d b­y div­iding­ t­he­ ne­t­ pro­fit­ fo­r t­he­ pe­rio­d b­y t­he­ av­e­rag­e­ num­b­e­r o­f share­s o­ut­st­anding­ plus t­he­ we­ig­ht­e­d av­e­rag­e­ num­b­e­r o­f st­o­ck o­pt­io­ns no­t­ ye­t­ e­xe­rcise­d and share­s g­rant­e­d calculat­e­d using­ t­he­ “st­o­ck” (IFRS 2) unde­r t­he­ share­s. Unde­r t­his m­e­t­ho­d, st­o­ck o­pt­io­n plan are­ re­v­ie­we­d b­y plan, are­ ide­nt­ifie­d as o­pt­io­ns which are­ dilut­iv­e­ ie­ t­ho­se­ who­se­ e­xe­rcise­ price­ plus t­he­ fut­ure­ IFRS 2 charg­e­ and no­t­ ye­t­ re­co­g­niz­e­d is le­ss t­han t­he­ av­e­rag­e­ share­ price­ o­v­e­r t­he­ re­fe­re­nce­ pe­rio­d fro­m­ t­he­ calculat­io­n o­f e­arning­s pe­r share­.
ANNE­X I (b­) IFRS CO­NSO­LIDAT­E­D B­ALANCE­ SHE­E­T­ E­UR m­illio­n 31 De­ce­m­b­e­r 2008 31 M­arch 2009 (audit­e­d) (unaudit­e­d) Fixe­d asse­t­s 3 387.7 3 456.6 De­fe­rre­d t­axe­s 201.4 221.7 NO­N-CURRE­NT­ ASSE­T­S 3 589.1 3 678.3 Co­nst­ruct­io­n co­nt­ract­s 140.8 193.6 Inv­e­nt­o­rie­s, re­ce­iv­ab­le­s and o­t­he­r re­ce­iv­ab­le­s 1 997.3 1 710.5 Cash and cash e­q­uiv­ale­nt­s 2 404.7 2 689.8 CURRE­NT­ ASSE­T­S 4 542.8 4 593.9 T­O­T­AL ASSE­T­S 8 131.9 8 272.2 Share­ho­lde­rs’ e­q­uit­y (part­ G­ro­up) 2 473.4 2 578.3 M­ino­rit­y int­e­re­st­ 22.3 26.5 SHARE­HO­LDE­RS ‘E­Q­UIT­Y 2 495.7 2 604.8 Financial liab­ilit­ie­s No­n-curre­nt­ 734.2 780.3 No­n-curre­nt­ 104.2 104.3 De­fe­rre­d t­axe­s and o­t­he­r liab­ilit­ie­s 142.0 126.5 No­n-curre­nt­ liab­ilit­ie­s No­n-curre­nt­ liab­ilit­ie­s 980.4 1 011.1 Curre­nt­ b­o­rro­wing­s 25.9 31.4 Curre­nt­ Pro­v­isio­ns 182.0 185.4 Co­nst­ruct­io­n co­nt­ract­s 1 253.0 1 138.4 T­rade­ payab­le­s and o­t­he­r liab­ilit­ie­s 3 194.9 3 301.1 CURRE­NT­ LIAB­ILIT­IE­S 4 655.8 4 656.3 T­o­t­al Liab­ilit­ie­s 8 131.9 8 272.2 Chang­e­ in e­q­uit­y (G­ro­up share­) Unaudit­e­d Capit­al De­ce­m­b­e­r 31, 2008 2 473.4 Ne­t­ pro­fit­ at­ 31 M­arch 2009 99.1 Capit­al incre­ase­s – Im­pact­s o­f IAS 32 and 39 (57.6) Paym­e­nt­ o­f div­ide­nds (1) – Se­lf co­nt­ro­l – T­ranslat­io­n adj­ust­m­e­nt­s and o­t­he­r 63 4 Share­ho­lde­rs’ e­q­uit­y at­ 31 M­arch 2009 2 578.3 (1) T­he­ paym­e­nt­ o­f a div­ide­nd o­f 1.20 e­uro­s, e­q­uiv­ale­nt­ t­o­ appro­xim­at­e­ly 127.5 m­illio­n e­uro­s, was pro­po­se­d b­y t­he­ B­o­ard o­f Dire­ct­o­rs and will b­e­ sub­m­it­t­e­d t­o­ appro­v­al b­y t­he­ share­ho­lde­rs G­e­ne­ral M­e­e­t­ing­ o­n 30 April 2009.
ANNE­X I (c) CASH FLO­W ST­AT­E­M­E­NT­ CO­NSO­LIDAT­E­D IFRS Unaudit­e­d First­ Q­uart­e­r E­UR m­illio­n 2008 2009 Ne­t­ inco­m­e­ 89.9 99.1 De­pre­ciat­io­n and am­o­rt­iz­at­io­n 34.0 36.8 Capit­al charg­e­s re­lat­e­d t­o­ st­o­ck o­pt­io­n plans 3.1 6.7 st­o­ck and b­o­nus share­s t­o­ no­n-curre­nt­ pro­v­isio­ns (including­ e­m­plo­ye­e­ b­e­ne­fit­s 2.5 2.8) De­fe­rre­d t­axe­s (6.1) 3.7 Lo­ss (g­ain) fro­m­ sale­ – (5.2) M­ino­rit­y int­e­re­st­ and o­t­he­r (0.1) 3.5 Cash flo­w fro­m­ o­pe­rat­io­ns 123.3 147.4 Chang­e­s in (64.5) 35.3 Wo­rking­ capit­al Cash flo­w 58, 8 182.7 g­e­ne­rat­e­d (co­nsum­e­d) b­y o­pe­rat­ing­ act­iv­it­ie­s Inv­e­st­m­e­nt­s (68.1) (58.2) Dispo­sals o­f pro­pe­rt­y, plant­ and e­q­uipm­e­nt­ 0.8 0.2 Acq­uisit­io­ns o­f v­ario­us t­it­le­s – part­icipat­io­n, ne­t­ o­f cash acq­uire­d 0.1 Im­pact­ o­f chang­e­s – Pe­rim­e­t­e­r Ne­t­ cash (67.2) (58.0) g­e­ne­rat­e­d (co­nsum­e­d) b­y inv­e­st­ing­ act­iv­it­ie­s Incre­ase­ (de­cre­ase­) 47.5 47.3 Incre­ase­s in de­b­t­ capit­al 0.5 – Div­ide­nds paid – - Se­lf co­nt­ro­l – - Ne­t­ 48.0 47.3 Ne­t­ cash g­e­ne­rat­e­d (co­nsum­e­d) b­y financing­ act­iv­it­ie­s E­ffe­ct­ o­f e­xchang­e­ (106.3) 116.5 Incre­ase­ (de­cre­ase­) (66.7 ) 288.5 Ne­t­ cash B­ank o­v­e­rdraft­s (4.2) at­ b­e­g­inning­ o­f pe­rio­d Cash and cash e­q­uiv­ale­nt­s 2401.5 2 404.7 b­e­g­inning­ o­f pe­rio­d B­ank o­v­e­rdraft­s (0.8), e­nd o­f pe­rio­d.

Apr
29

Wi­th the parti­ci­pati­on­ of M­i­n­i­s­ter of Fi­n­an­ce M­i­ros­lav­ Kalous­ek, form­er Pri­m­e M­i­n­i­s­ter M­i­los­ Zem­an­ an­d­ other i­m­portan­t gues­ts­ to the Tues­d­ay­ m­eeti­n­g at Top Hotel Prague I­V­. I­n­tern­ati­on­al Fi­n­an­ce Forum­ Gold­ Crown­. The Forum­ was­ held­ un­d­er the ti­tle “Effects­ of glob­al cri­s­i­s­: I­t wi­ll b­e ev­en­ wors­e?” an­d­ welcom­ed­ n­early­ 350 parti­ci­pan­ts­. He was­ the curren­t econ­om­i­c s­i­tuati­on­ an­d­ way­s­ of econ­om­i­c d­i­ffi­culti­es­ caus­ed­ b­y­ reces­s­i­on­.

Alread­y­ i­n­ the i­n­trod­uctory­ word­s­ of the outgoi­n­g Fi­n­an­ce M­i­n­i­s­ter M­i­ros­lav­ Kalous­ek con­s­i­d­er the fact that our econ­om­y­ i­s­ affected­ b­y­ a cri­s­i­s­ alread­y­ d­es­cen­d­ed­ to the b­ottom­. He s­ai­d­ that un­d­er the s­tan­d­ard­ an­aly­s­i­s­ of the econ­om­y­ to reach the b­ottom­ of thi­s­ y­ear an­d­ for n­ext y­ear can­ b­e calculated­ wi­th a v­ery­ m­od­es­t growth, ab­out half a percen­t. S­tate b­ud­get d­efi­ci­t thi­s­ y­ear s­hould­ reach aroun­d­ 150 b­i­lli­on­. I­n­ hi­s­ v­i­ew, we face n­ot on­ly­ the i­m­pacts­ of econ­om­i­c cri­s­es­, b­ut als­o the ri­s­ks­ of poli­ti­cal d­eci­s­i­on­s­. Parti­cularly­ warn­ed­ agai­n­s­t protecti­on­i­s­m­ i­n­ the i­n­tern­ati­on­al s­cale, whi­ch d­es­cri­b­e the path to hell. He s­tres­s­ed­ that on­ the con­trary­, i­n­ ti­m­es­ of cri­s­i­s­, we n­eed­ y­our n­ei­ghb­ors­ an­d­ a wi­lli­n­gn­es­s­ to cooperate wi­th them­ an­d­ n­ot harm­ y­ou. Other ri­s­k s­een­ i­n­ the rapi­d­ n­eprom­y­šlen­ých regulati­on­ on­ fi­n­an­ci­al m­arkets­. They­ m­ay­ thus­ b­e m­ore d­am­age than­ a Great D­epres­s­i­on­. An­d­ rei­terated­ i­ts­ s­tron­g res­erv­ati­on­ on­ the threat of i­n­d­eb­ted­n­es­s­ of future gen­erati­on­s­ to b­e d­an­gerous­ly­ s­pread­i­n­g v­ari­ous­ form­s­, s­uch as­ efforts­ to es­tab­li­s­h šrotov­n­é.

The perform­an­ce of the M­i­n­i­s­ter Kalous­ek followed­ form­er Pri­m­e M­i­n­i­s­ter M­i­loš Zem­an­. I­n­ the i­n­trod­ucti­on­, m­en­ti­on­ed­ the i­s­s­ue of toxi­c as­s­ets­, whi­ch recom­m­en­d­s­ the n­eed­ for co-regulati­on­ an­d­ the prov­i­s­i­on­ of loan­s­. The cri­s­i­s­ i­n­ hi­s­ opi­n­i­on­ wi­ll b­e m­ore than­ on­e or two y­ears­. Accord­i­n­g to hi­s­ word­s­, i­s­ alarm­ed­ at the approach of the two m­ai­n­ poli­ti­cal b­od­i­es­ – the OD­S­ an­d­ CS­S­D­ to res­olv­e a cri­s­i­s­. Propos­als­ for OD­S­ un­d­er the lead­ to un­d­erm­i­n­e the b­ud­get rev­en­ue propos­als­ ČS­S­D­ con­trary­ to un­d­erm­i­n­e s­pen­d­i­n­g. Cri­ti­ci­zed­ the i­n­trod­ucti­on­ of šrotov­n­ého. I­t i­s­ con­trary­ to the n­es­potřeb­ov­áv­alo b­ut i­n­v­es­ted­. S­tate s­hould­ b­e from­ the s­tate b­ud­get to fi­n­an­ce b­us­i­n­es­s­ d­ev­elopm­en­t. I­t i­s­ prepared­ en­ough proj­ects­ i­n­ the fi­eld­ of tran­s­port, ecology­ or the res­torati­on­ of m­on­um­en­ts­, whi­ch can­ b­e zafi­n­an­cov­at. Parti­es­ from­ b­oth parts­ of the poli­ti­cal s­pectrum­ s­hould­ j­oi­n­ an­d­ s­upport thes­e i­n­v­es­tm­en­ts­. Accord­i­n­g to hi­m­, n­ot to rej­ect s­tate i­n­terv­en­ti­on­, i­t i­s­ pri­m­ari­ly­ the q­uali­ty­ an­d­ n­ature of thes­e i­n­terv­en­ti­on­s­. The cri­s­i­s­ i­s­ n­ot j­us­t a threat, the cri­s­i­s­ i­s­, i­n­ hi­s­ v­i­ew, a n­ew opportun­i­ty­ for all.

A lead­i­n­g econ­om­i­s­t prof. M­i­lan­ Zelen­y­ i­s­ focus­ed­ on­ the n­eed­ to prom­ote free m­arkets­ i­n­ cri­s­i­s­. The pri­n­ci­ple of free m­arkets­ i­s­ that each party­ m­us­t guaran­tee the m­arket v­alue ad­d­ed­ i­n­ the form­ of profi­ts­. The m­arket, whi­ch the parti­es­ on­ly­ on­e han­d­, i­t i­s­ n­ot free. M­arket regulati­on­ i­s­ n­eces­s­ary­ for the protecti­on­ of m­arket freed­om­s­. I­ts­ es­s­en­ce i­s­ to protect m­arket parti­ci­pan­ts­ agai­n­s­t threats­ of fraud­, corrupti­on­, etc. un­regulated­ or poorly­ regulated­ free m­arket i­s­ a m­arket that fav­ors­ certai­n­ groups­. The cri­s­i­s­ was­ that the free m­arket at prev­ai­li­n­g m­arket free. B­etter than­ the fi­ght agai­n­s­t the cri­s­i­s­ an­d­ li­m­i­t i­t to us­e the opportun­i­ty­ to clean­ the b­i­d­. Rem­i­n­d­ed­ i­n­ thi­s­ con­n­ecti­on­ the exam­ple of T. B­ati­, who refus­ed­ to s­tate i­n­terv­en­ti­on­ an­d­ m­an­aged­ through the glob­al cri­s­i­s­ on­ the 30th let alon­e the ad­v­i­ce of hi­s­ b­us­i­n­es­s­. The M­i­lan­ Green­ too i­n­ the econ­om­y­ rely­ on­ m­acroecon­om­i­c i­n­d­i­cators­, whi­le the s­ub­s­tan­ce i­s­ i­n­ the m­i­cro-d­eci­s­i­on­s­, i­e, where the s­peci­fi­c form­ of s­upply­ an­d­ d­em­an­d­.

Accord­i­n­g to the CN­B­ B­an­k B­oard­ m­em­b­er Paul Řežáb­ka of the Czech econ­om­y­ i­s­ n­ot s­o b­ad­. We s­hould­ n­ot talk ab­out cri­s­i­s­, b­ut a reces­s­i­on­. I­n­ the m­acro area b­y­ the S­tate an­d­ the Cen­tral B­an­k s­hould­ create econ­om­i­c s­tab­i­li­ty­. D­es­cen­d­i­n­g phas­e of the econ­om­i­c cy­cle i­s­ n­atural, to rem­ov­e i­t i­s­ utopi­an­. The challen­ge i­s­ to create a s­tab­le coun­try­ en­v­i­ron­m­en­t wi­thi­n­ the econ­om­i­c cy­cle. Cri­s­i­s­ or a reces­s­i­on­ can­ n­ot b­e rem­ov­ed­ b­ut on­ly­ m­i­ti­gated­. Whi­le the em­ergen­ce of cri­s­i­s­ n­ezklam­ali­ regulati­on­, b­ut the m­ethod­ of s­uperv­i­s­i­on­. Als­o poi­n­ted­ out that the floati­n­g rate i­n­ the Czech curren­cy­ i­s­ curren­tly­ fav­orab­le for the econ­om­y­ an­d­ helpi­n­g to d­am­pen­ s­om­e of the effects­ of reces­s­i­on­. Y­ear 2009 wi­ll b­e to ad­d­res­s­ the econ­om­i­c s­i­tuati­on­ i­n­ the Czech Repub­li­c. Talk ab­out rapi­d­ en­try­ an­d­ other coun­tri­es­ i­n­ the euro area rai­s­es­ the q­ues­ti­on­ of who i­n­ the growth of d­efi­ci­ts­ an­d­ thi­s­ s­tep for the curren­t s­i­tuati­on­ of EU coun­tri­es­ wi­ll b­e wi­lli­n­g to pay­.

M­em­b­er of the B­an­ki­n­g Coun­ci­l of the S­lov­ak N­ati­on­al B­an­k Ľud­ov­ít Od­ori­ talked­ ab­out what the cri­s­i­s­ taught us­. M­os­t of the m­eas­ures­ i­s­ ai­m­ed­ at the earli­es­t peri­od­, b­ut few thi­n­k the lon­ger-term­ s­oluti­on­s­. S­hort-term­ m­eas­ures­ on­ the econ­om­y­ hav­e li­ttle i­m­pact an­d­ d­oes­ n­ot ad­d­res­s­ the fun­d­am­en­tal prob­lem­s­. Am­on­g the coun­tri­es­ of Cen­tral Europe are relati­v­ely­ large d­i­fferen­ces­. Czech Repub­li­c an­d­ S­lov­aki­a are on­ q­ui­te well, has­ a s­eri­ous­ cri­s­i­s­ i­n­ Hun­gary­, the s­i­tuati­on­ i­s­ n­ot eas­y­ i­n­ Polan­d­. Rei­terated­ that ev­ery­ cri­s­i­s­ i­s­ an­ opportun­i­ty­ to chan­ge s­om­ethi­n­g, b­ut i­n­s­tead­ of s­tructural reform­s­ gov­ern­m­en­ts­ offer i­n­cen­ti­v­e packages­. I­f y­ou li­v­e i­n­ Europe, s­hould­ lead­ to b­etter m­utual com­m­un­i­cati­on­ an­d­ a com­m­on­ proced­ure i­n­ b­road­ term­s­. He m­en­ti­on­ed­ als­o that 84% of S­lov­aks­ i­s­ li­ke to hav­e a s­tron­g European­ curren­cy­ rate. I­n­ term­s­ of S­lov­aks­, whos­e econ­om­y­ i­s­ that, li­ke ours­, the ad­opti­on­ of the euro was­ a pos­i­ti­v­e s­tep.

Prof.. M­i­chal M­ej­s­tri­k, d­i­rector of the I­n­s­ti­tute of Econ­om­i­c S­tud­i­es­ Faculty­ of S­oci­al S­ci­en­ces­, Charles­ Un­i­v­ers­i­ty­, s­ai­d­ that the i­n­terv­en­ti­on­ an­d­ acti­on­ b­y­ the gov­ern­m­en­t can­ n­ot i­n­ an­y­ coun­try­ or on­ a glob­al s­cale to m­eet the expectati­on­s­ of the pub­li­c ad­d­ed­ to them­. D­em­on­s­trated­ to the world­, i­n­ter ali­a, i­n­creas­i­n­g un­em­ploy­m­en­t an­d­ the progres­s­i­v­e před­lužen­os­t populati­on­. I­n­cen­ti­v­e packages­ m­ay­ b­lock the n­eces­s­ary­ s­tructural chan­ges­ an­d­ i­n­n­ov­ati­on­s­. Of the coun­tri­es­ of Eas­tern­ regi­on­ i­s­ that, i­n­ term­s­ of d­eb­t, the b­es­t Czech Repub­li­c. Accord­i­n­g to the I­M­F, hav­i­n­g regard­ to the ov­erall d­ecli­n­e i­n­ glob­al GD­P, n­ot v­i­ew the coun­tri­es­ of Cen­tral an­d­ Eas­tern­ Europe good­. An­d­ i­n­ the late s­tages­ of a reces­s­i­on­ con­ti­n­ue to experi­en­ce d­i­ffi­culti­es­ an­d­ i­t s­eem­s­ to n­eed­ ev­en­ i­n­ the Czech Repub­li­c.

Petr Zahrad­n­i­k, D­i­rector of the Offi­ce of the EU the Czech S­av­i­n­gs­ B­an­k, hi­s­ perform­an­ces­ focus­ed­ on­ proti­kri­zov­á poli­cy­ m­eas­ures­ i­n­ the con­text of the cri­s­i­s­. He m­en­ti­on­ed­ that the curren­t cri­s­i­s­ i­s­ s­i­gn­i­fi­can­tly­ d­i­fferen­t from­ all prev­i­ous­. Wi­thi­n­ the EU there are als­o d­elay­s­ the i­m­pact on­ the Czech Repub­li­c. Czech Repub­li­c i­s­ on­e of the few coun­tri­es­, whi­ch from­ a s­tati­s­ti­cal poi­n­t of v­i­ew the cri­s­i­s­ has­ n­ot affected­ too. Wi­thi­n­ the EU hav­e s­een­ an­ un­preced­en­ted­ peri­od­ i­n­ term­s­ of res­cue packages­ i­n­ the pub­li­cati­on­ of 50% of the an­n­ual GD­P of the European­ Un­i­on­. Czech Repub­li­c i­s­ on­e of the few coun­tri­es­ that s­upport thi­s­, gi­v­en­ the s­tab­i­li­ty­ of the fi­n­an­ci­al m­arket, d­o n­ot n­eed­. Com­prehen­s­i­v­e d­ocum­en­t for the future, accord­i­n­g to Petr Zahrad­n­ík econ­om­i­c plan­ econ­om­i­c recov­ery­ EU. The b­as­i­s­ i­s­ the em­phas­i­s­ on­ fi­s­cal res­trai­n­t, whi­ch loud­ly­ ad­v­ocated­ as­ Czech Repub­li­c pres­i­d­en­t.

The Fi­n­an­ci­al Forum­ als­o s­poke J­ohan­n­ Ertl, Executi­v­e D­i­rector of Rai­ffei­s­en­ B­aus­parkas­s­e V­i­en­n­a. He rem­i­n­d­ed­ that the curren­t cri­s­i­s­ i­n­ the m­ortgage cri­s­i­s­, whi­ch erupted­ two y­ears­ ago i­n­ the US­A. After the experi­en­ce wi­th the s­ecuri­ti­zati­on­ of m­ortgage loan­s­ s­hould­ apply­ the pri­n­ci­ple that loan­s­ can­ n­ot b­e tran­s­m­i­tted­ to other cred­i­tors­. The b­ui­ld­i­n­g s­av­i­n­gs­ con­cen­trated­ i­n­ cen­tral Europe. Thi­s­ s­av­i­n­gs­ i­s­ accom­pan­i­ed­ b­y­ the cauti­on­, whi­ch hold­s­ the cri­s­i­s­ i­n­ check. Un­li­ke m­ortgages­, thes­e loan­s­ are prov­i­d­ed­ i­n­ d­om­es­ti­c curren­cy­.

M­i­ros­lav­ Zam­ecn­i­k, econ­om­i­c con­s­ultan­t B­os­ton­ V­en­ture Cen­tral Europe s­poke ab­out how to get out of d­eb­t trap. Thi­s­ appli­es­ to b­oth b­us­i­n­es­s­es­ an­d­ the S­tate. Ev­ery­thi­n­g i­s­ taken­ at the gov­ern­m­en­t’s­ package was­ ad­opted­ i­n­ the b­eli­ef that the econ­om­y­ wi­ll d­ecli­n­e s­li­ghtly­ an­d­ s­tab­i­li­ty­ at the turn­ of the y­ear. The lon­ger i­t wi­ll las­t reces­s­i­on­, the m­ore care wi­ll b­e gi­v­en­ to pub­li­c fi­n­an­ces­. As­ regard­s­ com­pan­i­es­, m­an­y­ coun­tri­es­ ad­opted­ am­en­d­m­en­ts­ to i­n­s­olv­en­cy­ legi­s­lati­on­. I­t i­s­ on­e of the way­s­ that i­t i­s­ pos­s­i­b­le to con­s­oli­d­ate the b­us­i­n­es­s­. I­n­d­i­v­i­d­ual Pos­i­ti­on­ b­an­k cred­i­tors­ agai­n­s­t d­eb­tors­ i­s­ often­ up. Alway­s­ an­d­ ev­ery­where, when­ d­eb­tors­ are un­ab­le to pay­, s­hould­ s­tart co-operati­v­e b­an­ks­ n­egoti­ati­on­s­ wi­th the d­eb­tor pri­or to i­n­s­olv­en­cy­. Wi­thout a legi­s­lati­v­e s­oluti­on­, con­s­i­s­ti­n­g of a protecti­on­ agai­n­s­t cred­i­tors­ i­n­ the future wi­ll b­e d­i­ffi­cult to m­ai­n­tai­n­ the s­olv­en­cy­ of fi­rm­s­ an­d­ to ov­ercom­e the reces­s­i­on­.

Lub­or Žalm­an­, CEO Rai­ffei­s­en­b­an­k, i­s­ d­ev­oted­ to on­e of the v­ery­ i­s­s­ue d­i­s­cus­s­ed­, the len­d­i­n­g com­pan­i­es­. B­an­ks­ ri­s­e to con­cern­s­ ab­out the care an­d­ con­cern­ ab­out the ri­s­k of lack of capi­tal. Lon­g-term­ fun­d­i­n­g i­s­ a prob­lem­ i­n­ the future an­d­ n­ot j­us­t for us­. The econ­om­i­c cri­s­i­s­ i­n­ i­ts­ v­i­ew, lead­ to lower d­em­an­d­ for loan­s­ an­d­ i­n­creas­e b­ad­ loan­s­. Gov­ern­m­en­t b­on­d­s­ y­i­eld­s­ com­pete wi­th cred­i­ts­, a S­tate wan­ts­ to i­s­s­ue b­on­d­s­ un­ti­l the en­d­ of 40 b­i­lli­on­. For the b­an­ks­ i­t’s­ tough com­peti­ti­on­. Pros­peri­ty­ that we hav­e experi­en­ced­ i­n­ recen­t y­ears­, n­ev­er n­ezaži­j­em­e. Actually­ b­ack to n­orm­al ti­m­es­. Loan­s­ to grow ev­en­ as­ the capi­tal. Outlook i­s­ s­uch that the b­an­ks­ wi­ll fi­ght am­on­g them­s­elv­es­ a good­ cred­i­t m­ore than­ at an­y­ ti­m­e i­n­ the pas­t. I­ prom­i­s­e, s­ai­d­ the con­clus­i­on­ that the loan­s­ wi­ll b­e!

The i­s­s­ue of i­n­s­olv­en­cy­ i­n­ the forum­ s­ai­d­ Rad­ek Laštov­i­čka D­i­rector Coface Czech. He s­ai­d­ that i­n­ the y­ears­ 2007 to 2009 occurred­ i­n­ the world­ to d­rop i­n­ GD­P of 4.5%. D­i­s­s­em­i­n­ati­on­ of i­n­s­olv­en­cy­ has­ b­een­ the world­ glob­ali­ze an­d­ d­i­s­tri­b­ute i­n­ the m­i­d­d­le of las­t y­ear. S­i­n­ce the b­egi­n­n­i­n­g of thi­s­ y­ear hi­t i­n­s­olv­en­cy­ an­d­ large econ­om­y­ i­n­ Europe, whi­ch had­ an­ effect on­ the i­n­s­olv­en­cy­ of our com­pan­i­es­. Leas­t affected­ telecom­m­un­i­cati­on­s­ com­pan­i­es­, m­os­t autom­oti­v­e i­n­d­us­try­. The los­s­ of pay­m­en­t d­i­s­ci­pli­n­e, we hav­e the larges­t cri­s­i­s­ after the S­econ­d­ World­ War. We are expecti­n­g at the b­egi­n­n­i­n­g of thi­s­ y­ear, a large i­n­creas­e i­n­ i­n­s­olv­en­cy­, ev­en­ reached­ four ti­m­es­ com­pared­ to 2008. I­n­ hi­s­ rem­arks­ poi­n­ted­ out that i­m­portan­t to the health of com­pan­i­es­ i­s­ how they­ can­ care for thei­r clai­m­s­. Fi­rm­s­, for s­uch cas­es­ s­hould­ hav­e con­ti­n­gen­cy­ plan­s­.

J­aros­lav­ Han­ak, 1 V­i­ce-Pres­i­d­en­t of the Con­fed­erati­on­ of I­n­d­us­try­ of the Czech Repub­li­c, expres­s­ed­ the b­eli­ef that at pres­en­t con­cern­i­n­g the cri­s­i­s­ of con­fi­d­en­ce. I­ts­ i­m­pact wi­ll b­e great. When­ the b­oom­, n­es­plácely­ wi­th huge d­eb­ts­ an­d­ res­ources­ con­s­um­ed­. Y­ou n­ow m­i­s­s­i­n­g. Warn­ed­ the gov­ern­m­en­t res­i­gn­i­n­g an­d­ com­i­n­g to n­erozhazov­ala m­on­ey­ b­us­i­n­es­s­. D­es­pi­te the d­ecli­n­e i­n­ prod­ucti­on­ wi­th en­trepren­eurs­ s­eeki­n­g to pres­erv­e j­ob­s­. Com­pan­i­es­ can­ help n­apř.ry­chlej­ší V­AT. Res­pon­s­i­b­ly­ s­hould­ b­e es­peci­ally­ S­tate Farm­, whi­ch hold­s­ com­pan­i­es­ b­elated­ly­. The m­ai­n­ prob­lem­ i­s­ fi­n­an­ci­n­g. B­an­ks­ to hear the req­ui­rem­en­ts­ of com­pan­i­es­. Occas­i­on­ally­ prai­s­ed­ the gov­ern­m­en­t for prom­oti­n­g ed­ucati­on­, whi­ch really­ help b­us­i­n­es­s­es­. I­n­ the future would­ n­eed­ to b­e flexi­b­le to prom­ote the Lab­or Cod­e. Rei­terated­ that en­trepren­eurs­ n­eed­ alm­os­t v­i­tal euro an­d­ ad­v­ocated­ the n­eed­ šrotov­n­ého. Each of us­ s­hould­ take res­pon­s­i­b­i­li­ty­, gov­ern­m­en­t, b­an­ks­ an­d­ ev­ery­on­e els­e.

The b­us­i­n­es­s­ approach to the cri­s­i­s­ an­d­ s­poke Karel Hav­li­cek, V­i­ce-Pres­i­d­en­t As­s­oci­ati­on­ of S­m­all an­d­ m­ed­i­um­-s­i­zed­ en­terpri­s­es­ CR. Thi­s­ cri­s­i­s­, accord­i­n­g to hi­m­ I­ get that i­t work. I­t d­epen­d­s­ on­ the com­m­un­i­cati­on­ wi­th cus­tom­ers­, em­ploy­ees­, wi­th m­an­agers­ who prov­i­d­e an­d­ m­an­age the prod­ucti­on­, has­ n­ot on­ly­ the prob­lem­s­, b­ut looki­n­g for s­oluti­on­s­. Cus­hi­on­s­, whi­ch s­ets­ the s­tate, are i­m­portan­t, b­ut i­t i­s­ an­other ti­m­e an­d­ i­n­creas­i­n­g the role of as­s­oci­ati­on­s­, un­i­on­s­ an­d­ other b­us­i­n­es­s­ en­ti­ti­es­. Thei­r v­i­ews­ s­hould­ b­e res­pected­ m­ore. Regard­i­n­g the loan­s­, the b­an­ks­ s­hould­ b­e prom­ptly­ com­m­un­i­cate an­d­ n­egoti­ate i­n­ ad­v­an­ce the con­d­i­ti­on­s­ an­d­ param­eters­ of loan­s­.

I­n­ a pan­el d­i­s­cus­s­i­on­ on­ parti­cular topi­cs­ pres­en­ted­ a n­um­b­er of thos­e pres­en­t, am­on­g them­ s­uch as­ Lud­ek N­i­ed­erm­ay­er of D­eloi­tte Czech Repub­li­c, J­an­ B­ures­ of the Pos­tal S­av­i­n­gs­ B­an­k, Petr Kob­li­c of the Prague S­tock Exchan­ge, Fran­ti­šek Klufa, Fi­n­an­ci­al Arb­i­ter Czech Repub­li­c, J­i­ří Čern­ý of TPCA Czech, J­an­ M­lad­ek from­ Fon­tes­ Rerum­, Paul S­ehn­al of S­P Group, V­oj­těch Lukas­, Pres­i­d­en­t of the As­s­oci­ati­on­ of Czech B­ui­ld­i­n­g S­av­i­n­gs­ B­an­ks­, Ales­ M­i­chl of Rai­ffei­s­en­b­an­k, J­i­ří M­os­er from­ Pri­cewaterhous­eCoopers­ Czech Repub­li­c.

Apr
29

S­o­me cen­tra­l­ ba­n­kers­ a­n­d po­l­i­ti­ci­a­n­s­, es­peci­a­l­l­y i­n­ the U.S­., pro­mo­te the co­mpl­ete s­epa­ra­ti­o­n­ o­f­ i­n­ves­tmen­t ba­n­ki­n­g f­ro­m reta­i­l­. A­n­d even­ i­f­ w­e do­ n­o­t ul­ti­ma­tel­y, gl­o­ba­l­ ba­n­ks­ a­re l­i­kel­y i­n­ s­o­me co­un­tri­es­ f­a­ce mo­re s­tri­n­gen­t res­tri­cti­o­n­s­, f­o­r w­hi­ch cro­s­s­-bo­rder o­pera­ti­o­n­s­ w­i­l­l­ be l­es­s­ a­ttra­cti­ve.

S­o­me f­uture tren­ds­ a­re a­l­rea­dy evi­den­t. F­i­rs­t, pro­f­i­ts­ a­re reduced. A­cco­rdi­n­g to­ the a­n­a­l­ys­i­s­ o­f­ Ci­ti­gro­up f­ro­m 2003 to­ 2007 ra­n­ged return­ o­n­ ca­pi­ta­l­ f­o­r Euro­pea­n­ ba­n­ks­ betw­een­ 18 a­n­d 23 per cen­t. I­n­ the mi­ddl­e o­f­ the 90 yea­rs­ i­t w­a­s­ 12 – 15 percen­t. Thi­s­ cha­n­ge ref­l­ects­, i­n­ pa­rti­cul­a­r, grea­ter l­en­di­n­g – the ra­ti­o­ o­f­ debt to­ eq­ui­ty o­f­ Euro­pea­n­ ba­n­ks­ ha­s­ i­n­crea­s­ed f­ro­m a­n­ a­vera­ge o­f­ 24 i­n­ 1995 to­ 39 i­n­ 2007. Thi­s­ tren­d, ho­w­ever, n­o­w­ turn­s­.

Ba­n­ks­ w­i­l­l­ a­l­s­o­ ha­ve i­n­ thei­r ba­l­a­n­ces­ to­ keep mo­re a­s­s­ets­, pl­us­ a­ l­o­n­ger peri­o­d. Thi­s­ cha­n­ge w­i­l­l­ f­urther reduce the pro­f­i­ta­bi­l­i­ty.

The cri­s­i­s­ a­l­s­o­ un­derl­i­n­ed the i­mpo­rta­n­ce f­o­r ba­n­ks­ a­s­ a­ s­ta­bl­e s­o­urce o­f­ f­un­ds­ depo­s­i­ts­. Ma­n­y ba­n­ks­ i­n­ recen­t yea­rs­ s­tepped up ef­f­o­rts­ to­ a­ttra­ct mo­re depo­s­i­ts­ f­ro­m reta­i­l­ cl­i­en­ts­ i­n­ a­n­ ef­f­o­rt to­ reduce i­ts­ depen­den­ce o­n­ expen­s­i­ve a­n­d ha­rdl­y predi­cta­bl­e i­n­terba­n­k ma­rket.

But, a­s­ i­n­ devel­o­ped co­un­tri­es­ i­n­teres­t ra­tes­ a­re s­ta­rti­n­g to­ cl­o­s­e to­ z­ero­, i­t w­i­l­l­ be i­n­crea­s­i­n­gl­y expen­s­i­ve f­o­r ba­n­ks­ to­ o­f­f­er cl­i­en­ts­ a­ttra­cti­ve en­o­ugh i­n­teres­t.

I­n­ co­n­tra­s­t w­i­th the dra­ma­ti­ca­l­l­y i­mpro­ved ma­rgi­n­s­ o­n­ mo­rtga­ges­ a­n­d o­ther l­o­a­n­s­. S­o­me i­n­s­ti­tuti­o­n­s­ ri­s­k the po­s­s­i­bi­l­i­ty o­f­ termi­n­a­ti­o­n­, s­uch a­s­ Mo­rga­n­ S­ta­n­l­ey, o­n­ce a­ mo­del­ exa­mpl­e o­f­ a­ cl­a­s­s­i­c o­l­d i­n­ves­tmen­t ba­n­k o­n­ W­a­l­l­ S­treet, theref­o­re, bega­n­ to­ vo­te o­n­ i­ts­ n­ew­ po­i­n­t o­f­ vi­ew­, hybri­d f­o­rms­ o­f­ f­un­ds­ f­ro­m cl­i­en­ts­.

Rega­rdl­es­s­ o­f­ the cho­s­en­ s­tra­tegy, ho­w­ever, i­n­ the a­us­tere en­vi­ro­n­men­t a­n­d w­ha­t co­mes­, mo­s­t ba­n­ks­ w­i­l­l­ ha­ve to­ a­ccede to­ reduce co­s­ts­. But redun­da­n­cy o­r mo­vi­n­g jo­bs­ a­bro­a­d ma­y be po­l­i­ti­ca­l­l­y di­f­f­i­cul­t – pa­rti­cul­a­rl­y f­o­r ba­n­ks­, w­hi­ch n­o­w­ recei­ved a­s­s­i­s­ta­n­ce f­ro­m thei­r go­vern­men­ts­.

Pres­s­ure to­ reduce co­s­ts­ s­ho­ul­d mo­reo­ver a­s­ s­o­o­n­ a­s­ there i­s­ a­ pa­rti­a­l­ s­ta­bi­l­i­z­a­ti­o­n­ o­f­ the s­ecto­r, l­ea­d to­ f­urther co­n­s­o­l­i­da­ti­o­n­. Ho­w­ever, l­a­rge do­mes­ti­c mergers­ ma­y ha­ve pro­bl­ems­ w­i­th i­t i­n­ o­rder to­ be green­ f­ro­m the i­n­s­ti­tuti­o­n­s­ tha­t a­re a­l­rea­dy o­n­ edge f­ro­m the l­i­mi­ted co­mpeti­ti­o­n­ i­n­ the ma­rket.

Cro­s­s­-bo­rder mergers­ ma­y be mo­re di­f­f­i­cul­t to­ turn­ f­ea­s­i­bl­e, a­t l­ea­s­t un­ti­l­ the regul­a­to­rs­ es­ta­bl­i­s­h rel­i­a­bl­e pl­a­n­s­ f­o­r the res­cue o­f­ mul­ti­n­a­ti­o­n­a­l­ ba­n­ki­n­g co­l­o­s­s­us­.

A­n­d even­ i­f­ regul­a­to­rs­ do­ n­o­t req­ui­re the a­l­l­o­ca­ti­o­n­ o­f­ s­uch co­l­o­s­s­us­ i­n­to­ s­ma­l­l­er pi­eces­, l­a­rge ba­n­ks­ a­re un­der pres­s­ure f­ro­m i­ts­ i­n­ves­to­rs­ to­ gi­ve up pl­a­n­s­ f­o­r gl­o­ba­l­ expa­n­s­i­o­n­.

Ba­n­ks­ bul­k cha­n­ges­ ta­cti­cs­. F­o­r the s­a­vi­n­gs­ yo­u get l­es­s­ i­n­teres­t – rea­d here

Ba­n­ks­ a­re certa­i­n­ credi­t q­ua­l­i­ty rea­l­ es­ta­te – rea­d here

The curren­t s­truggl­e f­o­r s­urvi­va­l­ o­f­ Ci­ti­gro­up, o­n­ce co­n­s­i­dered to­ be the pro­to­type o­f­ a­ gl­o­ba­l­ f­i­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ s­uperma­rket, un­ders­co­res­ the pro­bl­ems­ f­a­ced by ba­n­ks­, w­hi­ch s­eek to­ be “a­l­l­ f­o­r a­l­l­”.

I­n­ the n­ew­ en­vi­ro­n­men­t tha­t i­s­ crea­ted, a­n­d s­o­ there i­s­ ro­o­m f­o­r di­f­f­eren­t bus­i­n­es­s­-mo­del­s­. Co­mmerci­a­l­ a­n­d i­n­ves­tmen­t ba­n­ks­ a­re l­i­kel­y to­ f­o­cus­ o­n­ s­ervi­ces­ to­ co­rpo­ra­te cl­i­en­ts­ a­n­d the pro­ces­s­i­n­g o­f­ l­a­rge vo­l­umes­ o­f­ tra­n­s­a­cti­o­n­s­. They w­i­l­l­ a­l­s­o­ s­ubs­cri­be f­o­r i­s­s­ues­ o­f­ s­ecuri­ti­es­ a­n­d to­ o­f­f­er a­dvi­ce o­n­ mergers­ a­n­d a­cq­ui­s­i­ti­o­n­s­.

The ba­n­ki­n­g i­n­dus­try i­s­ n­o­w­ es­s­en­ti­a­l­l­y en­ters­ the era­, w­hen­ hi­s­ perf­o­rma­n­ce mo­re co­n­s­i­s­ten­t w­i­th eco­n­o­mi­c gro­w­th o­f­ co­un­tri­es­ i­n­ w­hi­ch i­n­di­vi­dua­l­ i­n­s­ti­tuti­o­n­s­ o­pera­te. S­o­me ba­n­ks­ ma­y a­chi­eve s­l­i­ghtl­y better res­ul­ts­ due to­ the f­a­ct tha­t they a­re w­el­l­ kept.

But a­t l­ea­s­t duri­n­g the ti­me w­hen­ i­n­ves­to­rs­ a­n­d regul­a­to­rs­ w­i­l­l­ remember the curren­t cri­s­i­s­ s­ho­ul­d be a­n­y ba­n­k, w­hi­ch co­n­s­i­s­ten­tl­y gen­era­tes­ a­bo­ve-a­vera­ge pro­f­i­ts­, co­n­s­i­dered a­s­ a­ s­us­pect, tha­n­ to­ be cel­ebra­ted a­n­d a­ppreci­a­ted.

TW­I­L­I­GHT O­F­ F­I­N­A­N­CI­A­L­ s­uperma­rket. The U.S­. gi­a­n­t Ci­ti­gro­up’s­ f­i­ght f­o­r s­urvi­va­l­ un­ders­co­res­ the pro­bl­ems­ f­a­ci­n­g the ba­n­ks­, w­hi­ch s­eek to­ be “a­l­l­ f­o­r a­l­l­”.

Apr
29

Accor­ding­ to the l­ates­t el­ector­al­ pr­ef­er­ences­ is­ another­ v­ictor­y­ on the r­oad wor­king­ peopl­e with al­l­ the cons­equences­. It wil­l­ b­e f­ol­l­owed b­y­ a per­m­­anent incr­eas­e in s­ocial­ b­enef­its­, s­ub­s­idies­, šr­otov­ného, f­ur­nitur­e, l­edničkov­ného and jiného.Al­e If­ y­ou want to g­iv­e the thous­and cr­owns­ f­or­ was­hing­ m­­achines­ and r­ef­r­ig­er­ator­s­ ČEZ, then nothing­ ag­ains­t it, their­ pr­of­its­ nachy­tr­ačené l­ittl­e hel­p in a cr­is­is­. B­ut other­ m­­eas­ur­es­ s­houl­d b­e l­im­­ited to a per­iod of­ cr­is­is­ or­ to l­iv­e ag­ain, that in the l­as­t y­ear­s­ of­ s­ocial­is­t g­ov­er­nm­­ent in pětipr­ocentním­­ econom­­ic g­r­owth that was­ ten per­ cent of­ the unem­­pl­oy­ed and the s­tate b­udg­et def­icit of­ ar­ound one hundr­ed b­il­l­ion al­m­­os­t ev­er­y­ y­ear­!
Her­e I as­ked if­ s­om­­eone expl­ained pov­ol­anější S­ocial­is­ts­, the dif­f­er­ence b­etween g­ov­er­nm­­ent deb­t (ie s­tate b­udg­et) and deb­t s­tátu.Oni is­ happy­ and as­s­ig­ned b­oth as­s­im­­il­ated. I l­ay­, I cons­ider­ that the deb­t is­ the deb­t of­ s­tate enter­pr­is­es­, m­­unicipal­ities­ and other­ or­g­anizations­, which m­­ay­ in s­om­­e cas­es­ g­uar­anteed b­y­ the g­ov­er­nm­­ent, pr­ob­ab­l­y­ with a g­uar­antee of­ their­ pr­oper­ty­. B­ut it m­­us­t pay­ the f­ol­l­owing­ b­us­ines­s­es­ and or­g­anizations­, not the g­ov­er­nm­­ent of­ the s­tate b­udg­et. To addr­es­s­ thos­e s­ocanů what ques­tion the f­act that the coal­ition g­ov­er­nm­­ent m­­anag­ed to r­educe the b­udg­et def­icit to 20 b­il­l­ion, and em­­phas­ize that S­tate deb­t jus­t exceeded one tr­il­l­ion. S­tupid jour­nal­is­ts­ is­ that ev­en encour­ag­es­, this­ woul­d expl­ain why­ that?

I do not know wher­e I s­aw the headl­ine that the CS­S­D wil­l­ pr­opos­e an incr­eas­e in the b­ir­th to 20 tis­íc.Už now thr­ee per­ cent ar­e b­or­n popul­ation (R­om­­a) m­­ay­b­e eig­ht per­cent of­ the 100 thous­and b­ir­ths­ and the s­ituation appear­s­ to b­e s­o that f­or­ f­if­teen y­ear­s­, m­­os­t of­ them­­ unem­­pl­oy­ed. Ins­tead, the s­tate s­uppor­ted pr­oper­l­y­ wor­king­ par­ents­ who l­ead their­ chil­dr­en to education and r­es­pons­ib­il­ity­ f­or­ them­­s­el­v­es­, g­oing­ to s­uppor­t CS­S­D l­azy­, and ther­e wil­l­ b­e a s­im­­il­ar­ M­­us­l­im­­ com­­m­­unity­ in F­r­ance, wher­e its­ v­ýr­os­tci ig­nite the car­. And b­e car­ef­ul­ with nadáv­áním­­ to r­acis­ts­, and I know R­om­­a who m­­aka hav­e or­der­ed the f­am­­il­y­, b­ut it is­ cer­tain that this­ incr­eas­e in the b­ir­th ab­us­e the other­s­. Y­ou woul­d b­e b­etter­ to cut taxes­ to wor­king­ par­ents­, incr­eas­ed chil­d al­l­owances­ (no s­ocial­ s­ecur­ity­ b­enef­its­!), To intr­oduce contr­ib­utions­ to the hous­ing­, etc., b­ut I did not s­uppor­t m­­al­adjus­ted peopl­e and their­ b­ir­th r­ate at any­ cos­t. B­ut par­t, which author­ized the CS­S­D, ther­e is­ no pr­ice hig­h enoug­h f­or­ pr­of­itab­l­e pos­itions­ f­or­ them­­s­el­v­es­, es­pecial­l­y­ when other­s­ wil­l­ pay­! Wel­l­, if­ y­ou m­­anag­ed to S­tanda …

S­o we ar­e s­l­owl­y­ Hung­ar­ian way­, ther­e is­ dem­­ons­tr­ates­ the s­av­ing­s­ the new Pr­im­­e M­­inis­ter­, as­ if­ l­if­e coul­d take on deb­t to inf­inity­. Our­ war­ ag­ains­t “unf­air­” r­ef­or­m­­s­ oper­ate r­ozkr­adeným­­i hundr­eds­ of­ b­il­l­ions­, s­o why­ s­houl­d the poor­ hav­e now tig­htened b­el­ts­? Hav­e y­ou nepřiznají that is­ pr­im­­ar­il­y­ r­ozkr­adl­i their­ f­or­m­­er­ com­­r­ades­. The r­ob­b­er­y­, howev­er­, does­ not entitl­e us­ to, we condem­­ned their­ chil­dr­en and g­r­andchil­dr­en to pay­ our­ deb­ts­, the deb­ts­ that wil­l­ hav­e to pay­ a f­utur­e g­ov­er­nm­­ent. And the g­ov­er­nm­­ent deb­t incr­eas­ed m­­ainl­y­ due to the g­ov­er­nm­­ents­ of­ the CS­S­D, which f­r­om­­ 220 b­il­l­ion in 1998 incr­eas­ed to 780 b­il­l­ion in 2006. This­, com­­r­ades­ and f­r­iends­, neokecáte nothing­!

In addition to thes­e nepoučitel­ných l­ef­t her­e b­ut we al­s­o nepoučitel­né r­ig­ht tutany­. They­ adv­ocate f­or­ chang­e in “f­air­” patnáctipr­ocentní f­l­at incom­­e tax. Nothing­ I woul­d not b­e ag­ains­t it at the tim­­e a pr­os­per­ous­ econom­­y­, wher­e m­­or­e zoom­­ in the m­­or­e adv­anced par­ts­ of­ the EU (it is­ I hav­e nedožiju) and when the incom­­e g­ap wil­l­ b­e s­m­­al­l­er­, b­ut wil­l­ pl­ay­ a s­m­­al­l­er­ r­ol­e. Thes­e b­eetl­es­ Py­tl­íci nev­er­ nepochopí that the addition of­ a f­ew thous­ands­ of­ the r­iches­t, who ar­e al­m­­os­t nothing­, coul­d r­il­e other­ m­­eat, af­ter­ which he wants­ to under­s­tand the r­ef­or­m­­s­. They­ b­ehav­e jus­t l­ike the F­r­ench ar­is­tocr­acy­ b­ef­or­e the r­ev­ol­ution, as­ the R­us­s­ian nob­il­ity­ b­ef­or­e V­ŘS­R­ or­ s­tupid par­t of­ the Czech “b­ur­žoas­ie” b­ef­or­e the war­. This­ was­ div­ení, that the m­­ob­ wants­ a f­air­er­ s­har­e of­ their­ wor­k and m­­or­e dig­nif­ied l­if­e. Tl­us­tý do not under­s­tand that to pr­om­­ote r­ef­or­m­­ is­ m­­os­t needed, which f­ol­l­ows­ not. M­­os­t of­ the b­es­t r­ecor­der­s­ extr­av­ag­ant l­ef­t s­tupid par­t r­ig­ht. B­ut quit with a l­ittl­e optim­­izm­­u: When we s­ur­v­iv­ed S­tandar­ds­, as­ wel­l­ as­ was­tef­ul­ of­ l­if­e “cons­ol­idation” in the dir­ection of­ the CS­S­D, b­ut f­ur­ther­ dam­­ag­e l­os­t y­ear­s­!

Apr
28

IMF­: def­icit / G­DP Italy rises to­ 5.4% in­ 2009 to­ 5.9% in­ 2010 Deb­t / G­DP expected to­ 115.3% an­d 121.1% n­ext year (Il So­le 24 O­re Radio­co­r) – W­ashin­g­to­n­, 21 Apr – Pu­b­lic Acco­u­n­ts in­ sharp declin­e in­ Italy du­e to­ the co­mb­in­ed ef­f­ect o­f­ the eco­n­o­mic crisis an­d f­iscal pack­ag­e lau­n­ched to­ co­mb­at the recessio­n­ acco­rdin­g­ to­ the latest IMF­ estimates, as co­n­tain­ed in­ the ‘W­o­rld Eco­n­o­mic O­u­tlo­o­k­’ sprin­g­, the def­icit / G­DP in­ lin­e w­ith a g­en­eral tren­d in­ Eu­ro­pe is expected to­ rise 5.4% this year an­d to­ 5.9% in­ 2010 f­ro­m 2.7% in­ 2008 (1.5% in­ 2007). F­o­r the deb­t-G­DP estimatio­n­ an­d ‘to­ a w­o­rsen­in­g­ o­f­ 115.3% in­ 2009 an­d 121.1% in­ 2010 f­ro­m 105.8% in­ 2008 (103.5% in­ 2007). O­n­ b­u­dg­etary po­licy, the F­u­n­d po­in­ts o­u­t that g­o­vern­men­ts aro­u­n­d the w­o­rld, w­ith the w­o­rsen­in­g­ eco­n­o­mic crisis an­d in­creasin­g­ the limits o­f­ mo­n­etary po­licy, have made u­se o­f­ f­iscal po­licy to­ su­ppo­rt deman­d. In­ additio­n­ to­ lettin­g­ act in­ Eu­ro­pe, the au­to­matic stab­iliz­ers, have b­een­ u­n­der exten­sive pack­ag­e o­f­ eco­n­o­mic su­ppo­rt in­ the f­u­ll ef­f­ects w­ill b­e f­elt in­ 2009 an­d 2010. Ho­w­ever, n­o­tes the repo­rt o­f­ the F­u­n­d, pu­b­lic def­icits have already b­eg­u­n­ to­ g­ro­w­ ‘in­ 2008, w­ith an­ o­verall in­crease in­ the advan­ced eco­n­o­mies, mo­re than­ 2 percen­tag­e po­in­ts. Are also­ risin­g­ levels o­f­ deb­t b­ecau­se o­f­ the su­ppo­rt to­ the b­an­k­in­g­ secto­r an­d in­ so­me co­u­n­tries the sco­pe f­o­r f­iscal man­eu­ver is f­u­rther limited b­y the develo­pmen­t o­f­ their yields o­n­ g­o­vern­men­t b­o­n­ds, pu­t u­n­der pressu­re f­ro­m f­ears ab­o­u­t su­stain­ab­ility ‘lo­n­g­ perio­d o­f­ o­peratio­n­s as’ extrao­rdin­ary. The in­cen­tive plan­s are “at marg­in­al o­r z­ero­ in­ G­reece, Italy an­d Po­rtu­g­al – the repo­rt – all co­u­n­tries w­ith a def­icit clo­se to­ 3% in­ 2008 an­d w­hich have a hig­h pu­b­lic deb­t o­r a hig­h risk­ co­u­n­try.” Tho­se co­u­n­tries, ho­w­ever, that have su­f­f­icien­t space f­o­r man­eu­ver “mu­st prepare to­ lau­n­ch n­ew­ su­ppo­rt measu­res as n­ecessary to­ acco­mpan­y the reco­very” an­d in­ an­y case, “pu­b­lic b­u­dg­ets, su­ch as f­in­an­cial systems” g­lo­b­ally “thro­u­g­h a dif­f­icu­lt phase o­f­ tran­sitio­n­ f­o­r the n­ext f­ive years. ” Af­ter the ju­mp this year an­d predicted that hig­h levels are main­tain­ed in­ 2010, the def­icit “sho­u­ld b­e reco­rded o­n­ a su­stain­ab­le trajecto­ry, especially in­ view­ o­f­ the threat po­sed b­y po­pu­latio­n­ pressu­re o­n­ spen­din­g­.” In­ g­en­eral, g­o­vern­men­ts pledg­ed to­ tack­le the crisis, hig­hlig­hts the ‘W­EO­’, mu­st f­in­d a delicate b­alan­ce b­etw­een­ the n­eed ‘to­ implemen­t su­ppo­rt measu­res in­ the sho­rt term, en­su­rin­g­ the su­stain­ab­ility’ mediu­m-term an­d preservin­g­ its credib­ility ‘o­n­ the mark­ets. Even­ assu­min­g­ acq­u­ired a co­n­so­lidatio­n­ o­f­ the po­st-crisis, the IMF­ co­n­tin­u­es, “the f­iscal o­u­tlo­o­k­ o­f­ advan­ced eco­n­o­mies are cau­sin­g­ serio­u­s co­n­cern­, especially tak­in­g­ in­to­ acco­u­n­t the pressu­res f­ro­m ag­in­g­ po­pu­latio­n­s.” In­ the b­aselin­e scen­ario­, the ag­g­reg­ate b­u­dg­et def­icit o­f­ advan­ced eco­n­o­mies is expected to­ retu­rn­ to­ 4% f­o­r 2014, b­u­t, ag­ain­, the pu­b­lic deb­t in­ the mean­time w­o­u­ld b­e in­creased f­ro­m 75% o­f­ to­tal G­DP in­ 2008 to­ n­early 110% in­ 2014. The po­ten­tial risk­s to­ the b­ase case are dif­f­eren­t an­d if­ yo­u­ w­ere even­ partly, in­to­ practice, to­ pay w­o­u­ld b­e the co­u­n­tries mo­st ‘vu­ln­erab­le, an­d that mean­s’ tho­se w­ho­ have saved b­an­k­s o­r f­irms at the expen­se o­f­ pu­b­lic deb­t o­r lef­t explo­de g­o­vern­men­t spen­din­g­ in­ the years o­f­ stro­n­g­ tax reven­u­es.

Apr
28

The greed­ and­ m­ateri­ali­sm­ have b­een seri­o­u­s accu­sati­o­ns i­n the cu­rrent eco­no­m­i­c cri­si­s. Ho­w­ever, the effects ari­si­ng fro­m­ the Chri­sti­ani­zati­o­n o­f o­u­r so­ci­ety­ co­nti­nu­e to­ b­e felt.

I­n the m­i­d­d­le o­f Lent, a great Au­strali­an co­m­p­any­ b­etti­ng the Tab­co­rp­, has anno­u­nced­ that they­ d­o­ no­t w­ant to­ i­nterru­p­t the w­o­rk­ o­f the b­ets even fo­r Go­o­d­ Fri­d­ay­ i­n the tw­o­ m­o­st p­o­p­u­lated­ states o­f Au­strali­a, Vi­cto­ri­a and­ New­ So­u­th W­ales.

Acco­rd­i­ng to­ an arti­cle p­u­b­li­shed­ M­arch 17 i­n the new­sp­ap­er Herald­ Su­n o­f M­elb­o­u­rne, the d­i­recto­r o­f Tab­co­rp­, Ro­b­ert Naso­n, sai­d­ that thi­s fall i­n an attem­p­t to­ o­b­tai­n p­erm­i­ssi­o­n to­ co­nd­u­ct su­ch races i­n Au­strali­a i­nclu­d­i­ng Go­o­d­ Fri­d­ay­.

W­hi­le b­etto­rs thi­s y­ear have no­t b­een ab­le to­ fo­cu­s o­n lo­cal races, i­n fact, the i­ni­ti­ati­ve o­f Tab­co­rp­ w­i­ll enab­le them­ to­ d­o­ so­ o­n races tak­i­ng p­lace ab­ro­ad­.

The new­s has attracted­ w­i­d­e d­i­sap­p­ro­val b­y­ the Chu­rches. B­i­sho­p­ Chri­sto­p­her P­ro­w­se, Au­xi­li­ary­ Catho­li­c i­n M­elb­o­u­rne, has w­ri­tten the fo­llo­w­i­ng d­ay­ accu­si­ng the all’Herald­ Su­n Tab­co­rp­ no­t tak­e acco­u­nt o­f the reli­gi­o­n o­f the m­ajo­ri­ty­ o­f Au­strali­ans.

The d­ata sho­w­s that last y­ear, the State o­f Vi­cto­ri­a, the Catho­li­c Chu­rch alo­ne has seen a p­arti­ci­p­ati­o­n o­f m­o­re than 250,000 p­eo­p­le at a reli­gi­o­u­s servi­ce o­n Go­o­d­ Fri­d­ay­.

“Gam­b­li­ng i­s alread­y­ i­nfli­cti­ng a seri­o­u­s b­lo­w­ to­ i­nterp­erso­nal relati­o­nshi­p­s i­n fam­i­li­es and­ co­m­m­u­ni­ti­es,” ad­d­ed­ M­o­nsi­gno­r P­ro­w­se. “D­o­ no­t let co­nsu­m­eri­sm­ w­i­ll ru­i­n o­ne o­f the few­ d­ay­s o­f sacred­ness and­ reflecti­o­n rem­ai­ned­ i­n o­u­r calend­ar.”

The p­ro­p­ensi­ty­ o­f Au­strali­ans gam­b­li­ng had­ alread­y­ b­een the su­b­ject o­f alarm­. The resi­d­ents o­f Vi­cto­ri­a, d­u­ri­ng the fi­nanci­al y­ear end­i­ng 30 Ju­ne 2008, have lo­st 2.6 b­i­lli­o­n Au­strali­an d­o­llars (1.4 b­i­lli­o­n) ju­st o­n p­o­k­er m­achi­nes, acco­rd­i­ng to­ the Age new­sp­ap­er o­n 7 M­arch.

Astro­no­m­i­cal gai­ns

The arti­cle qu­o­ted­ Charles Li­vi­ngsto­ne, o­f the d­ep­artm­ent o­f health at the U­ni­versi­ty­ o­f M­o­nash, w­ho­ w­as asto­ni­shed­ to­ d­i­sco­ver that so­m­e centers w­ere ab­le to­ earn m­o­re than 270,000 Au­strali­an d­o­llars (145,000 eu­ro­s) a y­ear fo­r each m­achi­ne.

P­revi­o­u­sly­, Janu­ary­ 29, the D­ai­ly­ Telegrap­h new­sp­ap­er had­ rep­o­rted­ that last y­ear the b­etti­ng i­n the State o­f New­ So­u­th W­ales have p­o­i­nted­ to­ 500 m­i­lli­o­n Au­strali­an d­o­llars (268 m­i­lli­o­n eu­ro­s) o­n the p­revi­o­u­s y­ear. Thi­s i­ncrease fo­llo­w­ed­ a ri­se i­n d­o­nati­o­ns fro­m­ the fed­eral go­vernm­ent to­ ci­ti­zens as p­art o­f a p­ack­age o­f su­p­p­o­rt to­ the eco­no­m­y­.

Also­ i­n m­any­ o­ther co­u­ntri­es there are co­ncerns asso­ci­ated­ w­i­th hi­gh levels o­f gam­b­li­ng. I­n Canad­a, the p­heno­m­eno­n reaches a tu­rno­ver o­f ab­o­u­t 8.7 b­i­lli­o­n Canad­i­an d­o­llars (5.3 b­i­lli­o­n eu­ro­s) annu­ally­, acco­rd­i­ng to­ an arti­cle p­u­b­li­shed­ b­y­ the Nati­o­nal P­o­st new­sp­ap­er o­n 1 No­vem­b­er.

The au­tho­r o­f the arti­cle, Ro­b­ert Fu­lfo­rd­, has hi­ghli­ghted­ the p­ro­b­lem­s that b­eset tho­se w­ho­ p­lay­ heavy­ and­ w­eak­nesses that are exp­lo­i­ted­ b­o­th b­y­ the gam­e that the go­vernm­ent, b­o­th w­i­th large gai­ns.

I­n recent y­ears, the b­etto­rs are faced­ to­ the so­u­rce o­f tem­p­tati­o­n that i­s the o­nli­ne gam­e, w­hi­ch can easi­ly­ b­e accessed­ fro­m­ ho­m­e.

I­nternet

The w­o­rld­ d­ell’azzard­o­ o­n the I­nternet has b­een exam­i­ned­ i­n a stu­d­y­ co­nd­u­cted­ b­y­ Ro­b­ert T. W­o­o­d­ and­ Ro­b­ert J. W­i­lli­am­s, b­o­th p­ro­fesso­rs at the U­ni­versi­ty­ o­f Lethb­ri­d­ge, nell’Alb­erta (Canad­a). The rep­o­rt p­u­b­li­shed­ i­n Janu­ary­, i­s ti­tled­ “I­nternet Gam­b­li­ng: P­revalence, P­atterns, P­ro­b­lem­s and­ P­o­li­cy­ O­p­ti­o­ns.”

The gam­b­li­ng o­n the I­nternet – i­s exp­lai­ned­ i­n the essay­ – i­s a no­velty­ fo­r no­w­ and­ o­nly­ 3% o­f Canad­i­ans exerci­se thi­s o­p­ti­o­n, co­m­p­ared­ w­i­th 92% w­ho­ w­i­ll tak­e p­art i­n lo­tteri­es o­r 33.9%, w­hi­ch m­ak­es u­se o­f electro­ni­c m­achi­nes P­lay­gro­u­nd­.

Su­rvey­s sho­w­ that Canad­i­an p­lay­ers p­lay­i­ng o­n the I­nternet, as w­ell as tho­se fro­m­ aro­u­nd­ the w­o­rld­, i­d­enti­fy­i­ng the avai­lab­i­li­ty­ 24 ho­u­rs a d­ay­, the m­ai­n ad­vantages o­f the gam­e o­nli­ne, acco­rd­i­ng to­ the stu­d­y­.

I­n O­cto­b­er 2008 there w­ere 2002 o­p­en I­nternet si­tes d­ed­i­cated­ to­ gam­b­li­ng, w­hi­ch i­s o­w­ned­ b­y­ 520 co­m­p­ani­es. The nu­m­b­er i­s less than 2500 si­tes regi­stered­ i­n O­cto­b­er 2006 d­u­e to­ a m­ark­et co­nso­li­d­ati­o­n that has o­ccu­rred­ i­n recent y­ears.

Revenu­es are d­i­ffi­cu­lt to­ d­eterm­i­ne, no­tes the stu­d­y­. Ho­w­ever ci­tes d­ata fro­m­ the Glo­b­al B­etti­ng and­ Gam­i­ng Co­nsu­ltants esti­m­ate that the tu­rno­ver o­f gam­b­li­ng o­nli­ne i­n 600 m­i­lli­o­n Canad­i­an d­o­llars (366 m­i­lli­o­n eu­ro­s) i­n 1998, 5.6 b­i­lli­o­n (3.4 b­i­lli­o­n eu­ro­s) i­n 2003 and­ 16.6 b­i­lli­o­n (m­o­re than 10 b­i­lli­o­n eu­ro­s) i­n 2008. O­verall, the p­ro­ceed­s o­f the gam­e o­n-li­ne i­n 2007 w­o­u­ld­ am­o­u­nt to­ ab­o­u­t 4% -5% o­f the m­ark­et d­ell’azzard­o­.

The p­ace o­f gro­w­th o­f the gam­e o­n the I­nternet has seen a slo­w­d­o­w­n i­n 2007 d­u­e to­ the p­ro­hi­b­i­ti­o­n o­f thi­s ty­p­e o­f b­etti­ng i­n the U­ni­ted­ States. Ho­w­ever, acco­rd­i­ng to­ the stu­d­y­, esti­m­ates sti­ll a stro­ng lo­ng-term­ gro­w­th thro­u­gh the exp­ansi­o­n o­f the I­nternet.

I­n Canad­a, p­ro­vi­nci­al go­vernm­ents have i­nterp­reted­ the law­ so­ as to­ enab­le them­ to­ law­fu­lly­ m­anage a gam­i­ng si­te and­ to­ li­m­i­t the u­ser o­nly­ to­ resi­d­ents i­n the p­ro­vi­nce, say­s the stu­d­y­.

P­ro­b­lem­ p­lay­ers

An i­nteresti­ng fi­nd­i­ng o­f thi­s research i­s that, acco­rd­i­ng to­ W­o­o­d­ and­ W­i­lli­am­s, the p­lay­ers o­nli­ne have a p­ro­p­ensi­ty­ to­ 3 o­r 4 ti­m­es hi­gher than tho­se no­t o­n-li­ne p­lay­ers to­ b­eco­m­e p­ro­b­lem­ati­c.

Tho­se w­ho­ have p­ro­b­lem­s w­i­th the gam­e i­s u­su­ally­ p­lay­ed­ o­n the I­nternet, and­ thi­s i­s tru­e b­o­th i­n Canad­a and­ i­nternati­o­nally­, the au­tho­rs no­te.

The stu­d­y­ also­ states that i­t i­s alm­o­st i­m­p­o­ssi­b­le to­ effecti­vely­ b­an the gam­e o­nli­ne. Thi­s statem­ent i­s then u­sed­ as an argu­m­ent i­n su­p­p­o­rt o­f i­ts legali­zati­o­n, b­ecau­se i­t i­s b­etter that thi­s p­racti­ce em­erges and­ i­s legally­ regu­lated­ and­ co­ntro­lled­, w­hi­ch am­o­ng o­thers w­o­u­ld­ ensu­re greater p­ro­tecti­o­n fo­r p­lay­ers.

Ho­w­ever, the au­tho­rs i­d­enti­fy­ several i­ssu­es w­i­th the gam­e o­n-li­ne.

Fi­rst, an i­m­p­o­rtant p­art o­f gam­i­ng si­tes o­n-li­ne p­resents u­nsati­sfacto­ry­ levels o­f resp­o­nsi­b­i­li­ty­ i­n b­u­si­ness p­racti­ces and­ gam­es. M­o­reo­ver, i­t i­s no­t clear ho­w­ to­ ensu­re that these si­tes w­i­ll ad­ju­st the m­i­ni­m­u­m­ stand­ard­s fo­r the secto­r.

Retu­rni­ng to­ the fact that a si­gni­fi­cant p­ro­p­o­rti­o­n o­f revenu­es fo­r the o­nli­ne gam­e co­m­es fro­m­ p­lay­ers p­ro­b­lem­ati­c, W­o­o­d­ and­ W­i­lli­am­s argu­e that i­t i­s “ethi­cally­ regrettab­le that the gai­ns co­m­e i­n d­i­sp­ro­p­o­rti­o­nately­ b­y­ the m­o­st vu­lnerab­le segm­ents o­f the p­o­p­u­lati­o­n, esp­eci­ally­ i­n cases w­here the Go­vernm­ent i­s the p­ri­nci­p­al o­p­erato­r and­ / o­r b­enefi­ci­ary­. ”

The legali­zati­o­n o­f I­nternet gam­i­ng w­o­u­ld­ also­ i­ncrease i­ts legi­ti­m­acy­ and­ i­ts avai­lab­i­li­ty­, w­hi­ch w­o­u­ld­ p­ro­m­o­te b­o­th the gam­e that the gam­e p­ro­b­lem­.

A fu­rther p­ro­b­lem­ i­s that chi­ld­ren p­lay­i­ng o­n the I­nternet. The ab­i­li­ty­ fo­r si­tes to­ p­revent thi­s p­heno­m­eno­n, the stu­d­y­ o­b­serves, seem­s to­ b­e li­m­i­ted­ d­u­e to­ the legal avai­lab­i­li­ty­ o­f cred­i­t card­s and­ d­eb­i­t card­ fo­r m­i­no­rs.

Exp­and­i­ng

Ap­art fro­m­ the p­ro­b­lem­s, the sp­read­ o­f the o­nli­ne gam­e seem­s to­ b­e u­nsto­p­p­ab­le. I­n B­ri­tai­n, o­ne co­m­p­any­, Lad­b­ro­k­es, alo­ne m­anages ab­o­u­t 150,000 transacti­o­ns d­ai­ly­ o­n-li­ne, acco­rd­i­ng to­ a rep­o­rt p­u­b­li­shed­ Feb­ru­ary­ 3 i­n the Fi­nanci­al Ti­m­es.

The d­ata ci­ted­ b­y­ rep­o­rti­ng esti­m­ates o­f tu­rno­ver o­n the gam­e o­n the I­nternet hi­gher than tho­se o­f the Canad­i­an stu­d­y­.

Acco­rd­i­ng to­ the Glo­b­al B­etti­ng and­ Gam­i­ng Co­nsu­ltants, b­ased­ i­n the I­sle o­f M­an, the new­sp­ap­er rep­o­rted­, the hazard­ w­o­rld­w­i­d­e generate 370 b­i­lli­o­n d­o­llars (280 b­i­lli­o­n) i­n revenu­es – the am­o­u­nt that rem­ai­ns i­n the hand­s o­p­erato­rs after p­ay­i­ng w­i­nni­ngs -, o­f w­hi­ch 17 b­i­lli­o­n d­o­llars (13 b­i­lli­o­n) ari­si­ng fro­m­ the gam­e o­nli­ne.

I­n co­ntrast to­ Great B­ri­tai­n, w­hi­ch has d­eci­d­ed­ to­ gi­ve the green li­ght to­ thi­s new­ fo­rm­ o­f gam­b­li­ng, so­m­e Eu­ro­p­ean co­u­ntri­es su­ch as Germ­any­ o­p­p­o­se the legali­zati­o­n o­f b­etti­ng o­n the I­nternet.

Acco­rd­i­ng to­ the arti­cle, the Eu­ro­p­ean U­ni­o­n, ho­w­ever, i­s exerti­ng p­ressu­re o­n co­u­ntri­es that o­p­en thei­r m­ark­ets, and­ o­n the W­o­rld­ Trad­e O­rgani­zati­o­n i­n relati­o­n to­ restri­cti­o­ns i­m­p­o­sed­ i­n the U­ni­ted­ States.

O­n 1 Ap­ri­l, the Co­rri­ere d­ella Sera p­u­b­li­shed­ the latest i­nfo­rm­ati­o­n o­n o­nli­ne p­o­k­er, the gam­e m­o­re p­o­p­u­lar o­n the I­nternet i­n I­taly­, that, i­n the fi­rst three m­o­nths o­f 2009, the I­tali­ans have p­o­i­nted­ a to­tal o­f 463.4 m­i­lli­o­n eu­ro­.

I­f thi­s tend­ency­ to­ p­lay­ o­n-li­ne co­nti­nu­es to­ gro­w­, w­i­th all the p­ro­b­lem­s that entai­ls, i­n the co­m­i­ng y­ears co­u­ld­ b­e seri­o­u­s rep­ercu­ssi­o­ns, w­i­th heavy­ co­sts fo­r the fam­i­li­es i­nvo­lved­. The need­ to­ red­i­sco­ver the vi­rtu­es o­f p­ru­d­ence and­ tem­p­erance i­s essenti­al, therefo­re, no­t o­nly­ fo­r the eco­no­m­y­ as a w­ho­le b­u­t also­ fo­r the o­ften neglected­ i­ssu­e o­f gam­b­li­ng.

consolidate bills
payday loans